From: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Arch list <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipr: don't doublefree pages from scatterlist
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:15:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43E7A06D.80901@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1139247516.3022.6.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1827 bytes --]
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 16:45 +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>> But I'd also want James or someone to clarify the paragraph
>> "Please note that the sg cannot be mapped again if it has been mapped once.
>> The mapping process is allowed to destroy information in the sg."
>> which I took as explicitly allowing what x86_64 does in gart_map_sg.
>> I thought James had a scenario in mind which demands this wholesale
>> destruction, but it seems not; and I now read that first sentence as
>> saying the sg must be unmapped before it can be mapped a second time,
>> not that it can only be mapped once.
>>
>> And add a paragraph explaining that really the one array of scatterlist
>> entries should be regarded as two arrays of possibly different lengths,
>> the page,offset,length array and the dma_address,dma_length array:
>> because entries of the latter may be coalesced, so that in the end
>> the dma_address in a scatterlength entry may bear no relation to the
>> page pointer in that same entry, but to the page pointer in a later entry.
>> Though it gets hard to explain given that not all architectures coalesce,
>> so may not even have a separate dma_length field; or use different naming.
>> If you can express this better than I, please do!
>
> Yes, I added that piece after the x86_64 problem. The original x86_64
> bug was that you couldn't do dma_map_sg() then dma_unmap_sg() then
> dma_map_sg() on the same scatterlist (the map was destroying information
> which wasn't restored on the unmap, so the second map produced an
> incorrect scatterlist), which was causing a bug in all SCSI drivers
> (because that's the way SCSI requeueing works).
Here is a second try at a documentation update. Any takers to fixup x86_64?
Brian
--
Brian King
eServer Storage I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: dma_mapping_clarification.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch; name="dma_mapping_clarification.patch", Size: 2407 bytes --]
The current pci_map_sg API is a bit unclear what it is allowed
to modify in the passed scatterlist when coalescing entries.
Clarify the pci_map_sg API to prevent it from modifying
the page, offset, and length fields in the scatterlist.
Signed-off-by: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
---
linux-2.6-bjking1/Documentation/DMA-API.txt | 5 +++--
linux-2.6-bjking1/Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -puN Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt~dma_mapping_clarification Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt
--- linux-2.6/Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt~dma_mapping_clarification 2006-02-06 13:05:52.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6-bjking1/Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt 2006-02-06 13:05:52.000000000 -0600
@@ -513,7 +513,10 @@ consecutive sglist entries can be merged
ends and the second one starts on a page boundary - in fact this is a huge
advantage for cards which either cannot do scatter-gather or have very
limited number of scatter-gather entries) and returns the actual number
-of sg entries it mapped them to. On failure 0 is returned.
+of sg entries it mapped them to. The implementation is free to do this
+by modifying the scatterlist fields specified for DMA. The scatterlist
+fields used as an input to this function (i.e. page, offset, and length)
+will NOT be modified. On failure 0 is returned.
Then you should loop count times (note: this can be less than nents times)
and use sg_dma_address() and sg_dma_len() macros where you previously
diff -puN Documentation/DMA-API.txt~dma_mapping_clarification Documentation/DMA-API.txt
--- linux-2.6/Documentation/DMA-API.txt~dma_mapping_clarification 2006-02-06 13:06:17.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6-bjking1/Documentation/DMA-API.txt 2006-02-06 13:07:40.000000000 -0600
@@ -318,8 +318,9 @@ than <nents> passed in if the block laye
elements of the scatter/gather list are physically adjacent and thus
may be mapped with a single entry).
-Please note that the sg cannot be mapped again if it has been mapped once.
-The mapping process is allowed to destroy information in the sg.
+Please note that the sg can be mapped again, as long as it is unmapped
+first. The mapping process is only allowed to modify the scatterlist
+fields related to DMA.
As with the other mapping interfaces, dma_map_sg can fail. When it
does, 0 is returned and a driver must take appropriate action. It is
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-06 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20051129092432.0f5742f0.akpm@osdl.org>
2005-11-29 18:34 ` Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related? Ryan Richter
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.63.0511292147120.5739@kai.makisara.local>
2005-11-29 20:31 ` Ryan Richter
2005-11-29 20:48 ` Kai Makisara
2005-11-29 20:58 ` Ryan Richter
2005-11-29 21:36 ` Kai Makisara
2005-11-30 5:12 ` Kai Makisara
2005-12-01 19:18 ` Kai Makisara
2005-12-01 19:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-01 19:56 ` Ryan Richter
2005-12-01 20:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-12-01 21:44 ` Kai Makisara
2005-12-02 18:03 ` Ryan Richter
2005-12-02 18:43 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-12-02 19:12 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-12-02 19:44 ` Ryan Richter
2005-12-02 20:40 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-12-03 17:29 ` Ryan Richter
2005-12-06 16:08 ` Ryan Richter
2005-12-06 20:31 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-12-06 20:43 ` Ryan Richter
2005-12-07 18:37 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-12-08 2:26 ` Ryan Richter
2005-12-12 16:54 ` Ryan Richter
2005-12-12 17:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-12 17:45 ` James Bottomley
2005-12-12 18:04 ` Ryan Richter
2005-12-12 18:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-12-12 18:24 ` James Bottomley
2005-12-15 19:09 ` Ryan Richter
2005-12-16 4:01 ` James Bottomley
2005-12-17 3:31 ` Ryan Richter
2005-12-26 23:42 ` Ryan Richter
2005-12-27 16:21 ` Kai Makisara
2006-01-03 19:03 ` Ryan Richter
2006-01-04 17:27 ` Ryan Richter
2006-01-04 21:48 ` Kai Makisara
2006-01-05 5:40 ` Ryan Richter
2006-01-05 20:12 ` Ryan Richter
2006-01-05 21:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-08 22:36 ` Ryan Richter
2006-01-09 3:31 ` Ryan Richter
2006-01-09 4:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-09 5:13 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-09 5:45 ` Ryan Richter
2006-01-09 5:57 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-09 9:44 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-09 18:53 ` Ryan Richter
2006-01-09 19:31 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-09 20:05 ` Ryan Richter
2006-01-18 0:12 ` Ryan Richter
2006-01-18 16:00 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-03 19:46 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-03 19:51 ` [PATCH] ib: don't doublefree pages from scatterlist Hugh Dickins
2006-02-03 23:13 ` Roland Dreier
2006-02-03 19:53 ` [PATCH] st: " Hugh Dickins
2006-02-03 20:38 ` Mike Christie
2006-02-03 21:16 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-04 12:10 ` Kai Makisara
2006-02-04 15:01 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-03 19:55 ` [PATCH] ipr: " Hugh Dickins
2006-02-03 22:06 ` Brian King
2006-02-04 0:26 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-05 21:35 ` Brian King
2006-02-06 9:32 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-06 9:46 ` David S. Miller
2006-02-06 14:46 ` Brian King
2006-02-06 16:45 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-06 17:38 ` James Bottomley
2006-02-06 19:15 ` Brian King [this message]
2006-02-06 21:11 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-06 21:49 ` David S. Miller
2006-02-06 22:11 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-06 22:13 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-07 3:09 ` Ryan Richter
2006-02-11 22:38 ` Ryan Richter
2006-02-12 18:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-12 21:29 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-13 17:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-06 15:02 ` James Bottomley
2006-02-06 17:01 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-02-03 19:56 ` [PATCH] osst: " Hugh Dickins
2006-02-03 21:10 ` Fw: crash on x86_64 - mm related? Ryan Richter
2006-02-04 11:58 ` Kai Makisara
2006-02-04 14:46 ` Hugh Dickins
2006-01-05 22:09 ` Kai Makisara
2006-01-04 18:26 ` Ryan Richter
2005-12-07 18:30 ` Ryan Richter
2005-12-07 18:56 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-12-07 19:06 ` Ryan Richter
2005-12-06 17:57 ` Ryan Richter
2005-12-01 20:28 ` James Bottomley
2005-12-01 21:17 ` Kai Makisara
2005-12-02 13:45 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-12-02 17:59 ` Kai Makisara
2005-12-02 18:55 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-12-02 19:46 ` Kai Makisara
2005-12-02 20:47 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-12-04 9:29 ` Kai Makisara
2005-12-01 19:53 ` Ryan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43E7A06D.80901@us.ibm.com \
--to=brking@us.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox