From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965220AbWBHWmk (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:42:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965221AbWBHWmk (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:42:40 -0500 Received: from 10.121.9.213.dsl.getacom.de ([213.9.121.10]:52657 "EHLO ds666.starfleet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965220AbWBHWmk (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:42:40 -0500 Message-ID: <43EA73C9.7010101@l4x.org> Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 23:42:17 +0100 From: Jan Dittmer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051017 Thunderbird/1.0.7 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Balbir Singh CC: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dev@sw.ru, jblunck@suse.de References: <43E90573.8040305@l4x.org> <20060207162335.5304ae61.akpm@osdl.org> <43E9A260.6000202@l4x.org> <661de9470602081006p2a3132e8x2436de89e9395748@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <661de9470602081006p2a3132e8x2436de89e9395748@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.2.134 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jdi@l4x.org Subject: Re: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day... X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on ds666.starfleet) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Balbir Singh wrote: >>>>$ umount /mnt/data >>>>Segmentation Fault >>>> >>>>dmesg: >>>> >>>>VFS: Busy inodes after unmount. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day... >>>>Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000034 >>> >>> > > There were a couple of fixes suggested for the busy inodes afer > unmount problem. Please see > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/25/17 > > and > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/30/108 > You could see if any one of them fixes your problem. There is also > Kirill's fix which was in mm (not sure about it now) Thanks for the suggestion, but I couldn't reproduce it with a simple mount/umount and the partition in question is gone for good now. And I don't feel like risiking 450gb of data, even if I had a backup of the data... Jan