public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@gmx.de>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
	John M Flinchbaugh <john@hjsoft.com>,
	reiserfs-list@namesys.com, Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.15 Bug? New security model?
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:47:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43F01D70.70600@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060212005541.107f7011.vsu@altlinux.ru>

This is an xattr bug, and I'll let jeff answer it.

Hans

Sergey Vlasov wrote:

>On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 14:11:24 -0800 Chris Wright wrote:
>
>  
>
>>* Bernd Schubert (bernd-schubert@gmx.de) wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Er, you mean /proc/fs/reiserfs/{partition}/on-disk-super?
>>>      
>>>
>>Yup.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>bernd@bathl ~>grep attrs_cleared /proc/fs/reiserfs/hda6/on-disk-super
>>>flags:  1[attrs_cleared]
>>>      
>>>
>>>>2) does mount -o attrs ... make a difference?
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Yes, 2.6.13 now makes the same trouble. No difference with 2.6.15.3. 
>>>I played with mount -o noattrs, this makes no difference with 2.6.13, but has 
>>>some effects to 2.6.15.3. Creating files in /var/run is possible again, 
>>>lsattr gives "lsattr: Inappropriate ioctl for device While reading flags 
>>>on /var/run", but deleting files in /var/run is still impossible (still 
>>>rather bad for the init-scripts).
>>>      
>>>
>
>Is the filesystem in question old - could it be created initially in the
>reiserfs v3.5 format (used with 2.2.x kernels) and later converted to
>v3.6 (by mounting with the "conv" option)?
>
>  
>
>>Yes, that's what I thought.  There's still some backward logic in there.
>>noattrs vs. attrs triggers whether the code path that's patched in
>>2.6.15.3 is taken.  I'll dig a bit more, but hopefully the reiserfs folks 
>>can fix this for us.
>>    
>>
>
>Here is a simple test case which reproduces the problem with a
>filesystem converted from v3.5:
>
># dd if=/dev/zero of=tmp.img bs=1M count=100
># mkreiserfs --format 3.5 -f tmp.img
># mount -t reiserfs -o loop,conv tmp.img /mnt/disk/
># umount /mnt/disk/
># reiserfsck --clean-attributes tmp.img
># mount -t reiserfs -o loop tmp.img /mnt/disk/
>
>At this point, I get obviously wrong attributes on /mnt/disk:
>
># lsattr -d /mnt/disk/
>-----a--c---- /mnt/disk/
>
>BTW, this breaks even with kernels earlier than 2.6.15.2, if you also
>add the "attrs" options to the last mount command.
>
>Apparently the reiserfs attrs code has been broken for such converted
>filesystems for some time, but it could be enabled only with the "attrs"
>option, so people were not hitting this.  However, the following patch:
>
>http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=2949ccf9379678df66ecf2ca70ed4656159eacdd
>
>changed the logic to enable the "attrs" option on all filesystems which
>have the reiserfs_attrs_cleared flag.  But that patch was broken - it
>did not really set the option properly, so the attrs-related breakage
>did not became visible until yet another patch:
>
>http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d35c602870ece3166cff3d25fbc687a7f707acf3
>
>which later made into 2.6.15.2, and caused problems for some people.
>
>I have noticed that fs/reiserfs/inode.c:init_inode() does not initialize
>REISERFS_I(inode)->i_attrs and inode->i_flags (as done by
>sd_attrs_to_i_attrs()) in the branch for v1 stat data; maybe this causes
>the problem?
>  
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-02-13  5:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-08  1:12 2.6.15 Bug? New security model? Bernd Schubert
2006-02-08  1:31 ` Sam Vilain
2006-02-08  5:37   ` John M Flinchbaugh
2006-02-08 12:14     ` Bernd Schubert
2006-02-08 20:50       ` Chris Wright
2006-02-08 21:46         ` Bernd Schubert
2006-02-08 22:11           ` Chris Wright
2006-02-11 21:55             ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-02-11 23:50               ` Bernd Schubert
2006-02-12 18:44                 ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-02-12 17:57               ` Jeff Mahoney
2006-02-12 19:21                 ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-02-12 23:03                   ` Bernd Schubert
2006-02-13 17:52                     ` Sergey Vlasov
2006-02-12 23:10                 ` Bernd Schubert
2006-02-13  5:47               ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2006-02-13 15:24                 ` Jeff Mahoney
2006-02-13 16:39                   ` Hans Reiser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43F01D70.70600@namesys.com \
    --to=reiser@namesys.com \
    --cc=bernd-schubert@gmx.de \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=jeffm@suse.com \
    --cc=john@hjsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
    --cc=sam@vilain.net \
    --cc=vsu@altlinux.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox