From: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
Cc: quilt-dev@nongnu.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Quilt-dev] Quilt 0.43 has been released! [SERIOUS BUG]
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:36:53 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43F15E65.4090102@bigpond.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200602140510.54960.agruen@suse.de>
Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 February 2006 04:25, Peter Williams wrote:
>
>>The problem arises when pushing a patch that has errors in it (due to
>>changes in the previous patches in the series) and needs the -f flag to
>>force the push. What's happening is that the reverse of the errors is
>>being applied to the "pre patch" file in the .pc directory. Then when
>>you pop this patch it returns the file to a state with the reverse of
>>the errors applied to it.
>
>
> Found and fixed. It's a missed rollback_patch on one of the two branches of
> the code that checks if a patch can be reverse applied.
That was quick.
> This case apparently
> doesn't trigger as easily as it seems, or else we would have found it sooner.
> Still quite bad.
>
> Shall we wait until the translations are up-to-date again, or release 0.44
> immediately?
>
>
>>I'm having trouble understanding how quilt could be dumb enough to do
>>this as surely the "pre patch" file in the .pc directory should be just
>>a copy of the file before the patch is applied.
>
>
> Hey, it's just a bug.
:-)
>
>
>>This bug can completely hose a set of patches if the user doesn't notice
>>it very early and do something about it. The work around is to revert
>>to version 0.42 of quilt.
>
>
> You should have sent your gquilt announcement to the quilt-dev list as well.
> Thank you for summarizing the changes.
Sorry. They were mainly due to your change from "-p <patch>" to "-P
<patch>" for some commands. The other issue was a change to the return
value and error message when "quilt top" was used in a directory without
any quilt data. So no real changes to gquilt as seen by the user just
implementation changes.
BTW the --version function made it possible to make gquilt still work
with versions earlier than 0.43.
Thanks
Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-14 4:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060202230210.05a6ad4a.khali@linux-fr.org>
2006-02-14 3:25 ` [Quilt-dev] Quilt 0.43 has been released! [SERIOUS BUG] Peter Williams
2006-02-14 4:10 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-02-14 4:36 ` Peter Williams [this message]
2006-02-14 8:18 ` Jean Delvare
2006-02-14 15:15 ` Yasushi SHOJI
2006-02-14 15:55 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-02-14 22:50 ` Peter Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43F15E65.4090102@bigpond.net.au \
--to=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=agruen@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quilt-dev@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox