public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
Cc: quilt-dev@nongnu.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Quilt-dev] Quilt 0.43 has been released! [SERIOUS BUG]
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:36:53 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43F15E65.4090102@bigpond.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200602140510.54960.agruen@suse.de>

Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 February 2006 04:25, Peter Williams wrote:
> 
>>The problem arises when pushing a patch that has errors in it (due to
>>changes in the previous patches in the series) and needs the -f flag to
>>force the push.  What's happening is that the reverse of the errors is
>>being applied to the "pre patch" file in the .pc directory.  Then when
>>you pop this patch it returns the file to a state with the reverse of
>>the errors applied to it.
> 
> 
> Found and fixed. It's a missed rollback_patch on one of the two branches of 
> the code that checks if a patch can be reverse applied.

That was quick.

> This case apparently 
> doesn't trigger as easily as it seems, or else we would have found it sooner. 
> Still quite bad.
> 
> Shall we wait until the translations are up-to-date again, or release 0.44 
> immediately?
> 
> 
>>I'm having trouble understanding how quilt could be dumb enough to do
>>this as surely the "pre patch" file in the .pc directory should be just
>>a copy of the file before the patch is applied.
> 
> 
> Hey, it's just a bug.

:-)

> 
> 
>>This bug can completely hose a set of patches if the user doesn't notice
>>it very early and do something about it.  The work around is to revert
>>to version 0.42 of quilt.
> 
> 
> You should have sent your gquilt announcement to the quilt-dev list as well. 
> Thank you for summarizing the changes.

Sorry.  They were mainly due to your change from "-p <patch>" to "-P 
<patch>" for some commands.  The other issue was a change to the return 
value and error message when "quilt top" was used in a directory without 
any quilt data.  So no real changes to gquilt as seen by the user just 
implementation changes.

BTW the --version function made it possible to make gquilt still work 
with versions earlier than 0.43.

Thanks
Peter
-- 
Peter Williams                                   pwil3058@bigpond.net.au

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
  -- Ambrose Bierce

  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-14  4:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20060202230210.05a6ad4a.khali@linux-fr.org>
2006-02-14  3:25 ` [Quilt-dev] Quilt 0.43 has been released! [SERIOUS BUG] Peter Williams
2006-02-14  4:10   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-02-14  4:36     ` Peter Williams [this message]
2006-02-14  8:18     ` Jean Delvare
2006-02-14 15:15       ` Yasushi SHOJI
2006-02-14 15:55         ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2006-02-14 22:50       ` Peter Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43F15E65.4090102@bigpond.net.au \
    --to=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
    --cc=agruen@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quilt-dev@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox