public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "news.gmane.org" <kubisuro@att.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ck@vds.kolivas.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Implement Swap Prefetching v25
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:45:45 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43F1D0F9.1040502@att.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200602120141.46084.kernel@kolivas.org>

Hello,

Con Kolivas wrote:
> Everything is working nicely now, surviving a serious thrashing.
> Overall the behaviour I would say has improved as a result of all the
> modifications.
> 
> Many thanks go to Nick and Andrew for suggestions.
> 
> Andrew please consider this version for -mm.
> 
> Cheers,
> Con

I'm what one would call a typical desktop user.  I also very much a 
layman with kernels.  The layman is very interested in believing, if not 
knowing, that the kernel is doing everything within its power to provide 
application responsiveness, especially during heavy application loads.

Swap Prefetch has quantifiable and visible results when an application 
is swapped out and then swapped back in after a idle period (a very 
logical time to do things).  That /is/ an obvious interaction benefit.

I play World of Warcraft daily and it forces many applications into 
swap.  That said, I now regularly experience desktop conditions that are 
_very_ favorable with the Swap Prefetch patch soon as WoW is cleared out 
and resources are regained for productive desktop use (browser, email, 
chat, media, etc).  Hard disk activity, after an idle period, almost 
never get in the way of interactivity (likely due to swapping out) -- 
because they're back in physical memory.  That is _very_ good use of 
time and resources.

I'm very interested in seeing this patch applied to MM for major 
testing, so that others with typical desktop demands can get an idea of 
how this patch is beneficial.

Thanks for your attention,

Best of regards,
Ryan M.



      parent reply	other threads:[~2006-02-14 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-11 14:41 [PATCH] mm: Implement Swap Prefetching v25 Con Kolivas
2006-02-13 20:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-13 21:11   ` David Lang
2006-02-13 21:16     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-02-13 21:19       ` David Lang
2006-02-14  0:09   ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-14 12:45 ` news.gmane.org [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43F1D0F9.1040502@att.net \
    --to=kubisuro@att.net \
    --cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox