From: "Seewer Philippe" <philippe.seewer@bfh.ch>
To: "Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz" <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
"Phillip Susi" <psusi@cfl.rr.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: disk geometry via sysfs
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:11:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43F3367F.8020807@bfh.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1140012392.14831.13.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mer, 2006-02-15 at 10:01 +0100, Seewer Philippe wrote:
>
>>This would mean dropping the HDIO_GETGEO ioctl completely and force
>>applications such as fdisk/sfdisk and even dosemu to determine disk
>>geometry for themselves. Which I think actually would be the most
>>correct approach.
>
>
> In the IDE case the drive geometry has meaning in certain cases,
> specifically the C/H/S drive addressing case with old old drives.
>
>
Yes. But the addressing is abstracted by the kernel and we where talking
about dropping the getgeo ioctrl. Not geometry itself.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-15 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-10 13:06 RFC: disk geometry via sysfs Seewer Philippe
2006-02-13 9:56 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2006-02-15 7:57 ` Seewer Philippe
2006-02-13 16:32 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-13 19:02 ` Seewer Philippe
2006-02-13 19:22 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-02-13 19:36 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-14 16:35 ` Seewer Philippe
2006-02-13 19:34 ` Phillip Susi
[not found] ` <43F206E7.70601@bfh.ch>
2006-02-14 18:19 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-15 8:39 ` Seewer Philippe
2006-02-15 8:51 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2006-02-15 9:01 ` Seewer Philippe
2006-02-15 14:06 ` Alan Cox
2006-02-15 14:11 ` Seewer Philippe [this message]
2006-02-15 15:15 ` Alan Cox
2006-02-15 15:29 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-16 8:12 ` Seewer Philippe
2006-02-16 15:36 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-16 15:41 ` Seewer Philippe
2006-02-16 16:15 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-15 15:20 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-15 16:06 ` Alan Cox
2006-02-15 16:20 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-15 17:32 ` Alan Cox
2006-02-15 18:43 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-15 19:23 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-02-15 20:54 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-15 21:41 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-02-15 22:43 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-16 12:33 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-02-16 15:26 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-16 16:15 ` Seewer Philippe
2006-02-16 17:01 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-16 16:39 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-02-16 17:09 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-16 19:01 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-02-16 19:55 ` Phillip Susi
2006-02-16 8:18 ` Seewer Philippe
2006-02-16 18:14 ` Matt Domsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43F3367F.8020807@bfh.ch \
--to=philippe.seewer@bfh.ch \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=psusi@cfl.rr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox