From: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>,
"'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:57:24 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43F3F824.3020901@bigpond.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43F196B9.8080407@yahoo.com.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1158 bytes --]
Nick Piggin wrote:
> Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
>
>> Revert commit d7102e95b7b9c00277562c29aad421d2d521c5f6,
>> which causes more than 10% performance regression with aim7.
>>
>
> Just to be sure, what kernel did you test with? In particular,
> did it have the smpnice patch reverted (as -rc3 does).
>
Analysis of the smpnice code indicates that it could cause anomalous cpu
selection decisions in try_to_wake_up() if there is a skew in the
distribution of nice among the tasks on the cpus under consideration.
Attached for review is a proposed patch to address problem. In
particular, I request comments on the following issues:
1. Is this potential problem worth worrying about?
2. Do you agree with my decision to replace SCHED_LOAD_SCALE with the
average load per task for this_cpu in the if statement in
try_to_wake_up() or should I be using the average load per task for the
tasks current cpu in one or both places?
Signed-off-by: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.com.au>
Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au
"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce
[-- Attachment #2: fix-smpnice-try-to-wake-up --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1451 bytes --]
Index: MM-2.6.X/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- MM-2.6.X.orig/kernel/sched.c 2006-02-16 12:39:30.000000000 +1100
+++ MM-2.6.X/kernel/sched.c 2006-02-16 14:36:24.000000000 +1100
@@ -1061,6 +1061,18 @@ static inline unsigned long target_load(
}
/*
+ * Return the average load per task on the cpu's run queue
+ */
+static inline unsigned long cpu_avg_load_per_task(int cpu)
+{
+ runqueue_t *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+ unsigned long n = rq->nr_running;
+ unsigned long load = weighted_load(rq->prio_bias);
+
+ return n ? load / n : load;
+}
+
+/*
* find_idlest_group finds and returns the least busy CPU group within the
* domain.
*/
@@ -1309,6 +1321,7 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(task_t *p, uns
if (this_sd->flags & SD_WAKE_AFFINE) {
unsigned long tl = this_load;
+ unsigned long tl_per_task = cpu_avg_load_per_task(this_cpu);
/*
* If sync wakeup then subtract the (maximum possible)
* effect of the currently running task from the load
@@ -1318,8 +1331,8 @@ static int try_to_wake_up(task_t *p, uns
tl -= weighted_load(p->bias_prio);
if ((tl <= load &&
- tl + target_load(cpu, idx) <= SCHED_LOAD_SCALE) ||
- 100*(tl + SCHED_LOAD_SCALE) <= imbalance*load) {
+ tl + target_load(cpu, idx) <= tl_per_task) ||
+ 100*(tl + tl_per_task) <= imbalance*load) {
/*
* This domain has SD_WAKE_AFFINE and
* p is cache cold in this domain, and
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-16 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-14 3:12 [patch 1/2] fix perf. bug in wake-up load balancing for aim7 and db workload Chen, Kenneth W
2006-02-14 8:37 ` Nick Piggin
2006-02-16 3:57 ` Peter Williams [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43F3F824.3020901@bigpond.net.au \
--to=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox