From: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, drepper@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] lightweight robust futexes: -V1
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:57:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43F3F843.4030303@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060215151711.GA31569@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> This patchset provides a new (written from scratch) implementation of
> robust futexes, called "lightweight robust futexes". We believe this new
> implementation is faster and simpler than the vma-based robust futex
> solutions presented before, and we'd like this patchset to be adopted in
> the upstream kernel. This is version 1 of the patchset.
Thanks for such a detailed writeup and clean solution. Clearly a lot of time
and effort. The code was nicely commented and easy to read.
There was a reference in the thread about Ulrich having some robust mutex tests,
are those (or can they be made) publicly available?
--
Darren Hart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-16 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-15 15:17 [patch 0/5] lightweight robust futexes: -V1 Ingo Molnar
2006-02-15 15:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-15 17:35 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-15 17:50 ` Ulrich Drepper
2006-02-15 18:42 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-15 19:49 ` Christopher Friesen
2006-02-15 20:02 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-15 20:13 ` Antonio Vargas
2006-02-15 20:25 ` Andi Kleen
2006-02-15 20:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-15 20:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-15 19:05 ` Daniel Walker
2006-02-15 19:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-02-15 19:13 ` Daniel Walker
2006-02-15 21:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-16 15:43 ` Daniel Walker
2006-02-15 21:45 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-15 22:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-17 21:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-16 3:57 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2006-02-16 14:58 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2006-02-16 17:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-16 19:04 ` Daniel Walker
2006-02-17 9:09 ` Avi Kivity
2006-02-17 19:55 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2006-02-17 20:02 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43F3F843.4030303@us.ibm.com \
--to=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox