* 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable
@ 2006-02-20 14:35 Mark Lord
2006-02-21 5:09 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Lord @ 2006-02-20 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel; +Cc: Linus Torvalds
For the past week, I've been trying to keep with the latest -rc*-git*
releases of 2.6.16 on my notebook, and something new in those is
impacting resume-from-RAM.
It works most of the time, but *rarely* when suspended for more
than a few hours (like overnight). Which makes testing somewhat
challenging, as this is also my main work machine.
Black screen on resume, no response to alt-sysrq-b,
and no convenient serial port in the machine.
Works 100% with 2.6.15 kernels.
If I can figure out anything more that's useful, I'll do so,
but that's all I know about it right now.
Debugging resume on a "legacy free" notebook is not fun.
-ml
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable
2006-02-20 14:35 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable Mark Lord
@ 2006-02-21 5:09 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-21 23:47 ` Mark Lord
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2006-02-21 5:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Lord; +Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, linux-acpi
Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca> wrote:
>
> For the past week, I've been trying to keep with the latest -rc*-git*
> releases of 2.6.16 on my notebook, and something new in those is
> impacting resume-from-RAM.
>
> It works most of the time, but *rarely* when suspended for more
> than a few hours (like overnight). Which makes testing somewhat
> challenging, as this is also my main work machine.
>
> Black screen on resume, no response to alt-sysrq-b,
> and no convenient serial port in the machine.
>
> Works 100% with 2.6.15 kernels.
>
> If I can figure out anything more that's useful, I'll do so,
> but that's all I know about it right now.
>
> Debugging resume on a "legacy free" notebook is not fun.
>
It's awful, isn't it? git-bisct is the best bet, but at one bisection
point per day it could get a bit dull.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable
2006-02-21 5:09 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2006-02-21 23:47 ` Mark Lord
2006-02-21 23:50 ` Randy.Dunlap
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Lord @ 2006-02-21 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, linux-acpi
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca> wrote:
>> For the past week, I've been trying to keep with the latest -rc*-git*
>> releases of 2.6.16 on my notebook, and something new in those is
>> impacting resume-from-RAM.
Mmm.. working 100% now with Randy Dunlop's ACPI additions from here:
http://www.xenotime.net/linux/SATA/2.6.16-rc3/
Note that these are the latest evolution from a simpler patch by Jens
which I first started using in *spring 2005* to get suspend/resume working.
Are we *ever* going to add these to mainstream?
It's been almost a friggin' year!
Cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable
2006-02-21 23:47 ` Mark Lord
@ 2006-02-21 23:50 ` Randy.Dunlap
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Randy.Dunlap @ 2006-02-21 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Lord; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel, torvalds, linux-acpi
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Mark Lord wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca> wrote:
> >> For the past week, I've been trying to keep with the latest -rc*-git*
> >> releases of 2.6.16 on my notebook, and something new in those is
> >> impacting resume-from-RAM.
>
> Mmm.. working 100% now with Randy Dunlop's ACPI additions from here:
>
> http://www.xenotime.net/linux/SATA/2.6.16-rc3/
>
> Note that these are the latest evolution from a simpler patch by Jens
> which I first started using in *spring 2005* to get suspend/resume working.
>
> Are we *ever* going to add these to mainstream?
> It's been almost a friggin' year!
>
> Cheers
Yes, I understand (I think). Fortunately I haven't been working
on it quite that long.
I'm updating the patchset to 2.6.16-rc4 and then I'll post it,
probably tomorrow.
--
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-21 23:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-20 14:35 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable Mark Lord
2006-02-21 5:09 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-21 23:47 ` Mark Lord
2006-02-21 23:50 ` Randy.Dunlap
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox