public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: David Gibson <dwg@au1.ibm.com>
Cc: William Lee Irwin <wli@holomorphy.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Block reservation for hugetlbfs
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:38:42 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43FBB292.1000304@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060221233950.GB20872@localhost.localdomain>

David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 03:18:59PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:

>>This introduces
>>tree_lock(r) -> hugetlb_lock
>>
>>And we already have
>>hugetlb_lock -> lru_lock
>>
>>So we now have tree_lock(r) -> lru_lock, which would deadlock
>>against lru_lock -> tree_lock(w), right?
>>
>>From a quick glance it looks safe, but I'd _really_ rather not
>>introduce something like this.
> 
> 
> Urg.. good point.  I hadn't even thought of that consequence - I was
> more worried about whether I need i_lock or i_mutex to protect my
> updates to i_blocks.
> 
> Would hugetlb_lock -> tree_lock(r) be any preferable (I think that's a
> possible alternative).
> 

Yes I think that should avoid the introduction of new lock dependency.

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-22  1:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-21  2:21 RFC: Block reservation for hugetlbfs David Gibson
2006-02-21  4:18 ` Nick Piggin
2006-02-21 23:39   ` David Gibson
2006-02-22  0:38     ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2006-02-22  2:11       ` David Gibson
2006-02-22  3:09         ` Nick Piggin
2006-02-24  4:11           ` David Gibson
2006-02-24  6:22             ` Nick Piggin
2006-02-27  0:18               ` David Gibson
2006-02-21 19:25 ` Dave Hansen
2006-02-21 23:46   ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43FBB292.1000304@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=dwg@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox