From: Gautam H Thaker <gthaker@atl.lmco.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Gautam H Thaker <gautam.h.thaker@lmco.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: ~5x greater CPU load for a networked application when using 2.6.15-rt15-smp vs. 2.6.12-1.1390_FC4
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:25:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43FF5DBE.1080905@atl.lmco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060224165209.GC22097@thunk.org>
Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 02:55:56PM -0500, Gautam H Thaker wrote:
>
>>The real-time patches at the URL below do a great job of endowing Linux with
>>real-time capabilities.
>>
>>http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/
>
>
> Gautam,
>
> #1) Can you publish the code you used in your tests?
This may not be easy for me but I will try to get corp. approval(s).
Basically, the process that is, at least according to "top", showing ~5x
increased CPU usage is receiving very short UDP packets over a gigabit
interface at the rate of about 38,000 per second. UDP packets are small and
according to "/sbin/ifconfig" there are no errors, drops, overruns, frame or
carrier errors or collisions. (it is an isolated network of 20 PC3000s (3 GH
Xeon processors) at www.emulab.net.
>
> #2) Can you post your .config file? In particular, did you have any
> of the latency measurement options or other debugging options?
The config file I had used to build the "RT" kernel can be found at:
http://www.atl.external.lmco.com/projects/QoS/config.2.6.15-rt15-smp
I had tried to have all debug options off
>
> Regards,
>
> - Ted
Gautam
--
Gautam H. Thaker
Distributed Processing Lab; Lockheed Martin Adv. Tech. Labs
3 Executive Campus; Cherry Hill, NJ 08002
856-792-9754, fax 856-792-9925 email: gthaker@atl.lmco.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-24 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-23 19:55 ~5x greater CPU load for a networked application when using 2.6.15-rt15-smp vs. 2.6.12-1.1390_FC4 Gautam H Thaker
2006-02-23 20:15 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-02-23 20:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-23 21:06 ` Nish Aravamudan
2006-02-23 21:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-23 21:14 ` Nish Aravamudan
2006-02-23 22:07 ` Esben Nielsen
2006-02-24 8:03 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-02-24 12:11 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-24 20:06 ` Gautam H Thaker
2006-02-24 20:31 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-24 20:44 ` Gautam H Thaker
2006-02-24 16:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-02-24 19:25 ` Gautam H Thaker [this message]
2006-02-28 19:27 ` Matt Mackall
2006-02-28 22:19 ` Gautam H Thaker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-11 18:08 Jonathan Walsh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43FF5DBE.1080905@atl.lmco.com \
--to=gthaker@atl.lmco.com \
--cc=gautam.h.thaker@lmco.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox