From: Tao Xu <tao3.xu@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
hpa@zytor.com, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jingqi.liu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86: add support for user wait instructions
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 13:11:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43e2a62a-e992-2138-f038-1e4b2fb79ad1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190527103003.GX2623@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 27/05/2019 18:30, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 03:56:35PM +0800, Tao Xu wrote:
>> This patch adds support for UMONITOR, UMWAIT and TPAUSE instructions
>> in kvm, and by default dont't expose it to kvm and provide a capability
>> to enable it.
>
> I'm thinking this should be conditional on the guest being a 1:1 guest,
> and I also seem to remember we have bits for that already -- they were
> used to disable paravirt spinlocks for example.
>
Hi Peter,
I am wondering if "1:1 guest" means different guests in the same host
should have different settings on user wait instructions?
User wait instructions(UMONITOR, UMWAIT and TPAUSE) can use in guest
only when the VMCS Secondary Processor-Based VM-Execution Control bit 26
is 1, otherwise any execution of TPAUSE, UMONITOR, or UMWAIT causes a #UD.
So with a capability to enable it, we use qemu kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap()
to enable it. The qemu link is blew:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-05/msg05810.html
By using different QEMU parameters, different guests in the same host
would have different features with or without user wait instructions.
About "disable paravirt spinlocks" case, I am wondering if it uses
kernel parameters? If it uses kernel parameters, different guests in the
same host may have same settings on user wait instructions.
Or when we uses kernel parameters to disable user wait instructions, for
a host chooses to enable user wait instructions, we should do some work
on QEMU to choose disable or enable user wait instructions?
Thanks
Tao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-28 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-24 7:56 [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: x86: Enable user wait instructions Tao Xu
2019-05-24 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86: add support for " Tao Xu
2019-05-27 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-28 5:11 ` Tao Xu [this message]
2019-05-28 6:11 ` Wanpeng Li
2019-05-28 7:19 ` Tao Xu
2019-05-29 1:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-05-29 1:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-05-29 1:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-05-29 2:05 ` Tao Xu
2019-05-29 2:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-05-29 3:12 ` Tao Xu
2019-05-24 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: vmx: Emulate MSR IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL Tao Xu
2019-05-29 1:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-05-29 1:38 ` Tao Xu
2019-05-24 7:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: vmx: handle vm-exit for UMWAIT and TPAUSE Tao Xu
2019-05-29 1:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-05-29 2:25 ` Tao Xu
2019-05-29 2:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43e2a62a-e992-2138-f038-1e4b2fb79ad1@intel.com \
--to=tao3.xu@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jingqi.liu@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox