From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
To: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>, <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
<vishal.l.verma@intel.com>, <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
<bwidawsk@kernel.org>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <rrichter@amd.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 14/27] cxl/pci: Early setup RCH dport component registers from RCRB
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 16:58:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43eee2aa-8a3d-fa8c-c311-937fe2b02928@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230622035126.4130151-15-terry.bowman@amd.com>
On 6/21/23 20:51, Terry Bowman wrote:
> From: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
>
> CXL RAS capabilities must be enabled and accessible as soon as the CXL
> endpoint is detected in the PCI hierarchy and bound to the cxl_pci
> driver. This needs to be independent of other modules such as cxl_port
> or cxl_mem.
>
> CXL RAS capabilities reside in the Component Registers. For an RCH
> this is determined by probing RCRB which is implemented very late once
> the CXL Memory Device is created.
>
> Change this by moving the RCRB probe to the cxl_pci driver. Do this by
> using a new introduced function cxl_pci_find_port() similar to
> cxl_mem_find_port() to determine the involved dport by the endpoint's
> PCI handle. Plug this into the existing cxl_pci_setup_regs() function
> to setup Component Registers. Probe the RCRB in case the Component
> Registers cannot be located through the CXL Register Locator
> capability.
>
> This unifies code and early sets up the Component Registers at the
> same time for both, VH and RCH mode. Only the cxl_pci driver is
> involved for this. This allows an early mapping of the CXL RAS
> capability registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/port.c | 7 +++++
> drivers/cxl/cxl.h | 2 ++
> drivers/cxl/mem.c | 9 -------
> drivers/cxl/pci.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> index e0d2e7596440..679226023f0c 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> @@ -1480,6 +1480,13 @@ int devm_cxl_enumerate_ports(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(devm_cxl_enumerate_ports, CXL);
>
> +struct cxl_port *cxl_pci_find_port(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + struct cxl_dport **dport)
> +{
> + return find_cxl_port(pdev->dev.parent, dport);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_pci_find_port, CXL);
> +
> struct cxl_port *cxl_mem_find_port(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd,
> struct cxl_dport **dport)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index 7fbc52b81554..fe95f08acb69 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -664,6 +664,8 @@ struct cxl_port *find_cxl_root(struct cxl_port *port);
> int devm_cxl_enumerate_ports(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd);
> void cxl_bus_rescan(void);
> void cxl_bus_drain(void);
> +struct cxl_port *cxl_pci_find_port(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + struct cxl_dport **dport);
> struct cxl_port *cxl_mem_find_port(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd,
> struct cxl_dport **dport);
> bool schedule_cxl_memdev_detach(struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd);
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/mem.c b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> index 7638a7f8f333..205e2e280aed 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
> @@ -65,15 +65,6 @@ static int devm_cxl_add_endpoint(struct device *host, struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd,
> ep->next = down;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * The component registers for an RCD might come from the
> - * host-bridge RCRB if they are not already mapped via the
> - * typical register locator mechanism.
> - */
> - if (parent_dport->rch && cxlds->component_reg_phys == CXL_RESOURCE_NONE)
> - cxlds->component_reg_phys =
> - cxl_rcd_component_reg_phys(&cxlmd->dev, parent_dport);
> -
> endpoint = devm_cxl_add_port(host, &cxlmd->dev,
> cxlds->component_reg_phys,
> parent_dport);
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> index 945ca0304d68..99a75c54ee39 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/pci.c
> @@ -274,27 +274,66 @@ static int cxl_pci_setup_mailbox(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Assume that any RCIEP that emits the CXL memory expander class code
> + * is an RCD
> + */
> +static bool is_cxl_restricted(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + return pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END;
> +}
> +
> +static int cxl_rcrb_get_comp_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + struct cxl_register_map *map)
> +{
> + struct cxl_port *port;
> + struct cxl_dport *dport;
> + resource_size_t component_reg_phys;
> +
> + *map = (struct cxl_register_map) {
> + .dev = &pdev->dev,
> + .resource = CXL_RESOURCE_NONE,
> + };
> +
> + port = cxl_pci_find_port(pdev, &dport);
> + if (!port)
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +
> + component_reg_phys = cxl_rcd_component_reg_phys(&pdev->dev, dport);
> +
> + put_device(&port->dev);
> +
> + if (component_reg_phys == CXL_RESOURCE_NONE)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + map->resource = component_reg_phys;
> + map->reg_type = CXL_REGLOC_RBI_COMPONENT;
> + map->max_size = CXL_COMPONENT_REG_BLOCK_SIZE;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int cxl_pci_setup_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum cxl_regloc_type type,
> struct cxl_register_map *map)
> {
> int rc;
>
> rc = cxl_find_regblock(pdev, type, map);
> +
> + /*
> + * If the Register Locator DVSEC does not exist, check if it
> + * is an RCH and try to extract the Component Registers from
> + * an RCRB.
> + */
> + if (rc && type == CXL_REGLOC_RBI_COMPONENT && is_cxl_restricted(pdev))
> + rc = cxl_rcrb_get_comp_regs(pdev, map);
> +
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
> return cxl_setup_regs(map);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Assume that any RCIEP that emits the CXL memory expander class code
> - * is an RCD
> - */
> -static bool is_cxl_restricted(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> -{
> - return pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_END;
> -}
> -
> /*
> * CXL v3.0 6.2.3 Table 6-4
> * The table indicates that if PCIe Flit Mode is set, then CXL is in 256B flits
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-22 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-22 3:50 [PATCH v6 00/27] cxl/pci: Add support for RCH RAS error handling Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 01/27] cxl/port: Fix NULL pointer access in devm_cxl_add_port() Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 7:17 ` Robert Richter
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 02/27] cxl/acpi: Probe RCRB later during RCH downstream port creation Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 22:36 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 03/27] cxl: Updates for CXL Test to work with RCH Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 9:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 10:03 ` Robert Richter
2023-06-22 14:02 ` Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 22:38 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 04/27] cxl/rch: Prepare for caching the MMIO mapped PCIe AER capability Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 22:51 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 05/27] cxl: Rename member @dport of struct cxl_dport to @dport_dev Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 9:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 22:53 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 06/27] cxl: Rename 'uport' to 'uport_dev' Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 9:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 22:54 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 07/27] cxl/core/regs: Add @dev to cxl_register_map Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 11:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 23:07 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 08/27] cxl/pci: Refactor component register discovery for reuse Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 23:14 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 09/27] cxl/acpi: Move add_host_bridge_uport() after cxl_get_chbs() Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 23:17 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 10/27] cxl/acpi: Directly bind the CEDT detected CHBCR to the Host Bridge's port Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 23:28 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 11/27] cxl/port: Remove Component Register base address from struct cxl_dport Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 23:47 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 12/27] cxl/regs: Remove early capability checks in Component Register setup Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 23:48 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 13/27] cxl/mem: Prepare for early RCH dport component register setup Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 11:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 23:50 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 14/27] cxl/pci: Early setup RCH dport component registers from RCRB Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 23:58 ` Dave Jiang [this message]
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 15/27] cxl/port: Store the port's Component Register mappings in struct cxl_port Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 13:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-23 0:00 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 16/27] cxl/port: Store the downstream port's Component Register mappings in struct cxl_dport Terry Bowman
2023-06-23 0:01 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 17/27] cxl/pci: Store the endpoint's Component Register mappings in struct cxl_dev_state Terry Bowman
2023-06-23 0:02 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 18/27] cxl/hdm: Use stored Component Register mappings to map HDM decoder capability Terry Bowman
2023-06-23 0:03 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 19/27] cxl/port: Remove Component Register base address from struct cxl_port Terry Bowman
2023-06-23 0:04 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 20/27] cxl/pci: Add RCH downstream port AER register discovery Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 13:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-23 0:10 ` Dave Jiang
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 21/27] PCI/AER: Refactor cper_print_aer() for use by CXL driver module Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 22/27] cxl/pci: Update CXL error logging to use RAS register address Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 23/27] cxl/pci: Map RCH downstream AER registers for logging protocol errors Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 13:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 14:42 ` Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 24/27] cxl/pci: Add RCH downstream port error logging Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 25/27] cxl/pci: Disable root port interrupts in RCH mode Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 13:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 16:33 ` Terry Bowman
2023-06-23 13:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 26/27] PCI/AER: Forward RCH downstream port-detected errors to the CXL.mem dev handler Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 3:51 ` [PATCH v6 27/27] PCI/AER: Unmask RCEC internal errors to enable RCH downstream port error handling Terry Bowman
2023-06-22 13:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43eee2aa-8a3d-fa8c-c311-937fe2b02928@intel.com \
--to=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bwidawsk@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rrichter@amd.com \
--cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox