public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Reiser <jreiser@BitWagon.com>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] inflate pt1: clean up input logic
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:25:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4400D946.4090200@BitWagon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060225214704.GN13116@waste.org>

Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 09:22:48PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> 
>>init/do_mounts_rd.c:#include "../lib/inflate.c"
>>init/initramfs.c:#include "../lib/inflate.c"
>>
>>for these your arguments that halting is fine is _NOT_ correct nor is it
>>desirable.
> 
> 
> If you have an argument for why we shouldn't halt on failed
> init{rd,ramfs} decompression, I look forward to hearing it.

It depends on the nature of the error, and which parts were decompressed
successfully.  Gzip has optional "re-sync" capability, and ideally a
decompression failure might invoke some kind of bad-block tagging
for the output instead of halting the machine.  Some init{rd,ramfs}
have all the network drivers, all the SCSI drivers, all the sound
drivers, etc., but the user may care only about those for the current
machine.  Other init{rd,ramfs} contain only "essential" pieces.
Even then, the pieces that are deemed more important can be at the
beginning.  It might be possible to work without a sound driver,
but perhaps not without a SCSI driver.

> In my mind, being unable to decompress init* is every bit as fatal as
> being unable to mount root.

It may be possible to recover, at least partially, from one error
more than from another.  It would be nice if the decompressor itself
was a minor influence instead of a major one.

-- 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-02-25 22:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <0.399206195@selenic.com>
2006-02-24 20:12 ` [PATCH 4/7] inflate pt1: start moving globals into iostate Matt Mackall
2006-02-24 20:12 ` [PATCH 1/7] inflate pt1: lindent and manual formatting changes Matt Mackall
2006-02-24 20:12 ` [PATCH 2/7] inflate pt1: kill legacy bits Matt Mackall
2006-02-24 20:12 ` [PATCH 3/7] inflate pt1: clean up input logic Matt Mackall
2006-02-24 22:19   ` Russell King
2006-02-25  6:51     ` Matt Mackall
2006-02-25  8:49       ` Russell King
2006-02-25  8:55         ` Russell King
2006-02-25  9:04           ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-25  9:09             ` Russell King
2006-02-25 14:54         ` Matt Mackall
2006-02-25 18:05           ` Russell King
2006-02-25 21:04             ` Matt Mackall
2006-02-25 21:22               ` Russell King
2006-02-25 21:47                 ` Matt Mackall
2006-02-25 21:58                   ` Russell King
2006-02-25 22:37                     ` Matt Mackall
2006-02-25 22:57                       ` Russell King
2006-02-27  1:18                         ` Johannes Stezenbach
2006-02-27  8:32                           ` Russell King
2006-02-27 12:07                             ` Johannes Stezenbach
2006-02-27 15:47                               ` Russell King
2006-02-27  9:06                         ` Matt Mackall
2006-02-25 22:25                   ` John Reiser [this message]
2006-03-07 23:26                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-03-10 18:55                   ` Matt Mackall
2006-02-24 20:12 ` [PATCH 7/7] inflate pt1: eliminate memzero usage Matt Mackall
2006-02-24 20:12 ` [PATCH 5/7] inflate pt1: cleanup Huffman table code Matt Mackall
2006-02-24 21:52   ` John Reiser
2006-02-24 22:06     ` Matt Mackall
2006-02-24 20:12 ` [PATCH 6/7] inflate pt1: internalize CRC calculation, cleanup table calculation Matt Mackall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4400D946.4090200@BitWagon.com \
    --to=jreiser@bitwagon.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox