From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751715AbWB0XjL (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:39:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751785AbWB0XjL (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:39:11 -0500 Received: from shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net ([24.71.223.10]:36160 "EHLO pd5mo2so.prod.shaw.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751715AbWB0XjK (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:39:10 -0500 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:38:20 -0600 From: Robert Hancock Subject: Re: Question regarding call trace. In-reply-to: <5KW4H-13v-11@gated-at.bofh.it> To: linux-kernel Message-id: <44038D6C.3080907@shaw.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <5KW4H-13v-11@gated-at.bofh.it> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Justin Piszcz wrote: > I have a trace that looks like the following, my question is, are the > process(es) at the top of the call trace responible for the actual crash > of the machine? Are they the root cause? This looks like a dump from a SysRq-T keypress to dump the stack on all threads.. where is the crash? -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/