From: Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: [Fwd: [PATCH 3/5] NFS: Abstract out namespace initialisation [try #2]]
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 10:37:03 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <440613FF.4040807@vilain.net> (raw)
The attached patch abstracts out the namespace initialisation so that
temporary namespaces can be set up elsewhere.
Signed-Off-By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-By: Sam Vilain <sam.vilain@catalyst.net.nz>
---
David,
This looks sane to me, thought I'd just quickly ack it as I'm also doing
work in this area... it seems a lot of what you're doing is cleaning up
the boundaries between VFS and FS - did you get a chance to review the
patch Herbert Pötzl sent to the list about the permission() cleanup?
fs/namespace.c | 8 +-------
include/linux/namespace.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index 51d3ebc..0194538 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -1688,13 +1688,7 @@ static void __init init_mount_tree(void)
namespace = kmalloc(sizeof(*namespace), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!namespace)
panic("Can't allocate initial namespace");
- atomic_set(&namespace->count, 1);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&namespace->list);
- init_waitqueue_head(&namespace->poll);
- namespace->event = 0;
- list_add(&mnt->mnt_list, &namespace->list);
- namespace->root = mnt;
- mnt->mnt_namespace = namespace;
+ init_namespace(namespace, mnt);
init_task.namespace = namespace;
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
diff --git a/include/linux/namespace.h b/include/linux/namespace.h
index 3abc8e3..ea6fd62 100644
--- a/include/linux/namespace.h
+++ b/include/linux/namespace.h
@@ -17,6 +17,21 @@ extern int copy_namespace(int, struct ta
extern void __put_namespace(struct namespace *namespace);
extern struct namespace *dup_namespace(struct task_struct *, struct
fs_struct *);
+static inline void init_namespace(struct namespace *namespace,
+ struct vfsmount *mnt)
+{
+ atomic_set(&namespace->count, 1);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&namespace->list);
+ init_waitqueue_head(&namespace->poll);
+ namespace->event = 0;
+ namespace->root = mnt;
+
+ if (mnt) {
+ list_add(&mnt->mnt_list, &namespace->list);
+ mnt->mnt_namespace = namespace;
+ }
+}
+
static inline void put_namespace(struct namespace *namespace)
{
if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&namespace->count, &vfsmount_lock))
next reply other threads:[~2006-03-01 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-01 21:37 Sam Vilain [this message]
2006-03-02 8:44 ` [Fwd: [PATCH 3/5] NFS: Abstract out namespace initialisation [try #2]] Christoph Hellwig
2006-03-02 11:35 ` David Howells
2006-03-02 19:52 ` Sam Vilain
2006-03-02 21:12 ` David Howells
2006-03-02 21:53 ` Sam Vilain
2006-03-05 0:34 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-03 16:52 ` J. Bruce Fields
2006-03-02 20:00 ` Sam Vilain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=440613FF.4040807@vilain.net \
--to=sam@vilain.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox