From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>, Jan Blunck <jblunck@suse.de>,
Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>, Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Busy inodes after unmount, be more verbose in generic_shutdown_super
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 09:22:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <440D26A6.9040802@sw.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <661de9470603061849t470b0709v1987385c9845710e@mail.gmail.com>
>>>>+ /* avoid further wakeups */
>>>>+ sb->s_pending_iputs = 65000;
>>>
>>>This looks a bit ugly, what is 65000?
>>
>>Just the first big number that came to by head... probably not needed.
>>
>
>
> ok, I would rather use a const or a #define and hide it under a
> meaningful name, with comments. If it is not needed, then nothing like
> avoiding magic numbers.
It looks like this assignment is not needed at all if "wait_for_prunes"
is moved after dput(root), since no more dentries should exist after
that point and wakeup can not potentially happen.
Thanks,
Kirill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-07 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-02 6:57 [PATCH] Busy inodes after unmount, be more verbose in generic_shutdown_super Neil Brown
2006-03-02 10:48 ` Jan Blunck
2006-03-03 11:42 ` Jan Blunck
2006-03-06 6:09 ` Neil Brown
2006-03-06 7:32 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-07 1:58 ` Neil Brown
2006-03-07 2:49 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-07 6:22 ` Kirill Korotaev [this message]
2006-03-07 6:16 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-03-07 7:03 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-07 7:21 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-03-07 11:05 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-08 0:29 ` Neil Brown
2006-03-08 2:17 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-08 2:39 ` Neil Brown
2006-03-08 3:05 ` Balbir Singh
2006-03-08 11:01 ` Jan Blunck
2006-03-06 11:56 ` Jan Blunck
2006-03-07 2:15 ` Neil Brown
2006-03-06 11:56 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-03-07 2:01 ` Neil Brown
2006-03-07 6:20 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-03-07 23:20 ` Neil Brown
2006-03-09 12:03 ` Kirill Korotaev
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-16 22:34 Olaf Hering
2006-01-16 23:23 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-01-16 23:29 ` Olaf Hering
2006-01-17 2:05 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-17 7:03 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-01-18 22:49 ` Jan Blunck
2006-01-18 23:10 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-19 10:08 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-01-19 9:52 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-01-19 10:04 ` Jan Blunck
2006-01-19 10:26 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-01-20 19:06 ` Jan Blunck
2006-01-23 8:14 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-01-30 11:54 ` Jan Blunck
2006-01-30 14:05 ` Kirill Korotaev
2006-01-30 14:21 ` Jan Blunck
2006-01-30 14:34 ` Kirill Korotaev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=440D26A6.9040802@sw.ru \
--to=dev@sw.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@openvz.org \
--cc=jblunck@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=olh@suse.de \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox