From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <linux-os@analogic.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: de2104x: interrupts before interrupt handler is registered
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 07:58:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <440D918D.2000502@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0603070705490.8536@chaos.analogic.com>
linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
> No. It would be good if that was true. Unfortunately, the IRQ
> returned before the pci_enable_device() is not correct. It
> gets re-written by pci_enable_device().
That wasn't what I meant, yes, that is true in the current kernel.
However, any device which would start generating interrupts just because
its BARs got enabled by pci_enable_device seems broken.
The driver needs to request the interrupt after the device is enabled,
and only after that can it enable the device to generate interrupts.
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-07 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5N5Ql-30C-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5NnDE-44v-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-03-07 0:02 ` de2104x: interrupts before interrupt handler is registered Robert Hancock
2006-03-07 12:07 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-03-07 13:58 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2006-03-07 14:21 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-03-07 17:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-03-07 18:17 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-03-08 0:05 ` Robert Hancock
2006-03-08 8:18 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-03-08 16:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2006-03-08 19:34 ` Martin Michlmayr
2006-03-08 0:00 ` Robert Hancock
2006-03-08 12:03 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-03-08 23:34 ` Robert Hancock
2006-03-09 12:42 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
[not found] <5Nz1Y-4hZ-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5NKTG-4F7-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5NLmp-5sk-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5NODG-1RH-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5O23T-59S-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-03-09 0:02 ` Robert Hancock
2006-03-05 18:07 Martin Michlmayr
2006-03-05 18:59 ` Francois Romieu
2006-03-06 14:35 ` Martin Michlmayr
2006-03-06 19:17 ` Martin Michlmayr
2006-03-06 19:48 ` Francois Romieu
2006-03-06 19:59 ` Martin Michlmayr
2006-03-06 20:23 ` Francois Romieu
2006-03-06 20:29 ` Martin Michlmayr
2006-03-06 20:54 ` Francois Romieu
2006-03-07 5:16 ` Martin Michlmayr
2006-03-06 21:17 ` Francois Romieu
2006-03-07 5:11 ` Martin Michlmayr
2006-03-07 14:57 ` Martin Michlmayr
2006-03-08 0:15 ` Francois Romieu
2006-03-08 3:22 ` Martin Michlmayr
2006-03-07 15:16 ` Martin Michlmayr
2006-03-06 13:02 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=440D918D.2000502@shaw.ca \
--to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-os@analogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox