public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tim Small <tim@buttersideup.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Peterson <dsp@llnl.gov>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Doug Thompson <dthompson@lnxi.com>,
	bluesmoke-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC: core EDAC support code
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:06:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44115DA4.604@buttersideup.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1141976218.2876.2.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>

Arjan van de Ven wrote:

> It depends on how many PCI devices in your machine you wish to
>
>>blacklist or whitelist.  The motivation for this feature is that
>>certain known badly-designed devices report an endless stream of
>>spurious PCI bus parity errors.  We want to skip such devices when
>>checking for PCI bus parity errors.
>>    
>>
>
>ok so this is actually a per pci device property!
>I would suggest moving this property to the pci device itself, not doing
>it inside an edac directory.
>  
>
Yes, this seems more sensible to me.  For one thing, I suspect that just 
keying on vendor:device is probably too blunt for this and that 
blacklisting a particular PCI device revision is a likely requirement, 
as well as subsystem vendor/subsystem device.

Tim.


  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-10 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200601190414.k0J4EZCV021775@hera.kernel.org>
2006-03-05 10:18 ` [PATCH] EDAC: core EDAC support code Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-05 10:30   ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-06 18:14     ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-06 18:22       ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-03-07 17:03         ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-07 17:20           ` Greg KH
2006-03-08  0:29             ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-07 19:03           ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-07 19:05             ` Greg KH
2006-03-09 23:51             ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-10  0:02               ` Greg KH
2006-03-10  1:46                 ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-10  7:36                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-10 11:06                     ` Tim Small [this message]
2006-03-10 11:40                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-10 17:46                     ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-10 17:58                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-10 19:07                         ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-10 19:33                           ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-10 21:13                             ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-10 21:23                               ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-11  1:57                                 ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-11  7:18                                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-13 19:31                                     ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-06 19:52       ` Greg KH
2006-03-05 15:55   ` Greg KH
2006-03-05 16:24     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-06 18:52     ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-06 19:53       ` Greg KH
2006-03-06 21:01         ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-06 21:07           ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-09  3:19             ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-09  3:44               ` Al Viro
2006-03-09  5:51               ` Greg KH
2006-03-06 21:32           ` Al Viro
2006-03-06 21:53             ` Greg KH
2006-03-06 22:24               ` Al Viro
2006-03-06 22:55                 ` Greg KH
2006-03-07 10:41                 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-07 11:08                   ` Al Viro
2006-03-08  2:46                   ` Rusty Russell
2006-03-07  1:45               ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-03-07  1:57                 ` Greg KH
2006-03-07  2:10                   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-03-07 16:47             ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-07 17:04               ` Greg KH
2006-03-07 17:06                 ` Dave Peterson
2006-03-08  1:03                 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2006-03-08  1:33                   ` Greg KH
2006-03-10  0:44 Doug Thompson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-10 16:56 Doug Thompson
2006-03-10 17:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-10 17:28 Doug Thompson
2006-03-10 20:37 Doug Thompson
2006-03-11 17:04 Doug Thompson
2006-03-13 19:35 ` Dave Peterson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44115DA4.604@buttersideup.com \
    --to=tim@buttersideup.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=bluesmoke-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=dsp@llnl.gov \
    --cc=dthompson@lnxi.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox