From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: can I bring Linux down by running "renice -20 cpu_intensive_process"?
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:36:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <441180DD.3020206@wpkg.org> (raw)
I have a Linux server (kernel 2.6.8.1 + Linux RAID1) which is a "backup"
machine: it gets the files from other servers, compresses it, writes to
the tape, checks md5sums etc.
It's been running for quite a bit, no problems with stability so far.
Yesterday, something happened though.
I was logged in remotely, and the system was running md5sum against a 30
GB file.
I wanted the things to speed up a bit, and made "renice -20 <md5sum_pid>".
Few minutes after that I couldn't start any process, so I thought I made
the system so busy with renice -20, that my SSH session probably
disconnected.
In the morning, the system was still unavailable - I could ping it, I
could telnet to any of the ports opened, but nothing more happened.
SSH was waiting forever after:
debug1: identity file /root/.ssh/identity type -1
debug1: identity file /root/.ssh/id_rsa type -1
debug1: identity file /root/.ssh/id_dsa type -1
Nothing was displayed on the monitor (all black).
As I restarted the machine, I saw that the logging ends few minutes
after I changed the priority of md5sum to -20.
So here is my question: is it possible to bring down the machine by
simply doing "renice -20 cpu_intensive_process"?
As I said, this machine does heavy compression and md5sum calculations
of big files every day, and was stable all the time - but stopped
responding after I changed the priority of a CPU-intensive process to -20.
Coincidence and a hardware failure?
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org
next reply other threads:[~2006-03-10 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-10 13:36 Tomasz Chmielewski [this message]
2006-03-10 14:44 ` can I bring Linux down by running "renice -20 cpu_intensive_process"? Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-10 14:52 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2006-03-10 22:01 ` Måns Rullgård
2006-03-10 22:06 ` Jeffrey Hundstad
2006-03-11 10:42 ` Måns Rullgård
2006-03-12 1:41 ` Luke-Jr
2006-03-12 3:46 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-12 3:50 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-12 3:44 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-12 12:00 ` Måns Rullgård
2006-03-16 21:15 ` Bill Davidsen
2006-03-16 22:11 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-16 22:51 ` Måns Rullgård
2006-03-17 6:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-17 22:22 ` Måns Rullgård
2006-03-18 12:38 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=441180DD.3020206@wpkg.org \
--to=mangoo@wpkg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox