public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Dan Hecht <dhecht@vmware.com>,
	Dan Arai <arai@vmware.com>, Anne Holler <anne@vmware.com>,
	Pratap Subrahmanyam <pratap@vmware.com>,
	Christopher Li <chrisl@vmware.com>,
	Joshua LeVasseur <jtl@ira.uka.de>, Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
	Jyothy Reddy <jreddy@vmware.com>, Jack Lo <jlo@vmware.com>,
	Kip Macy <kmacy@fsmware.com>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>,
	Ky Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@novell.com>,
	Wim Coekaerts <wim.coekaerts@oracle.com>,
	Leendert van Doorn <leendert@watson.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:46:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <441658A2.4090905@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0603132329160.17874@cuia.boston.redhat.com>

Rik van Riel wrote:
> It would be very bad if Linus started applying code with
> a dubious license to the kernel, if we want to keep the
> kernel GPL v2.
>   

I believe it says explicitly in our patches that they are licensed under 
GPL v2.

> Having an explicit license and a Signed-off-by: line are
> things to remember with big patch sets.  At the very least
> a Signed-off-by: line.
>   

There is a Signed-off-by line on every patch I send out, with full 
knowledge that this constitutes the work of the author of the said line, 
and full knowledge that this commits the patch into the domain of the 
GPL license.  Sorry for sounding like a lawyer here.  IANAL, but I 
thought that was completely implicit in all patches made to GPL'd 
software.  The signed off by provides accountability and open licensing 
simultaneously.

But most importantly, I really don't understand how it is possible to 
make a patch to the Linux kernel and not release it under GPL.

Zach

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-14  5:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-13 17:58 [RFC, PATCH 0/24] VMI i386 Linux virtualization interface proposal Zachary Amsden
2006-03-13 18:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-13 18:22   ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-13 18:26     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-13 18:30       ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-13 18:42         ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-13 18:48           ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-13 19:02             ` Chris Wright
2006-03-13 18:56           ` Joshua LeVasseur
2006-03-16 18:52             ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-03-13 18:56         ` Hollis Blanchard
2006-03-13 18:59           ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-15 10:25     ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-03-15 15:57       ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-15 17:38       ` Joshua LeVasseur
2006-03-15 20:02         ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-16  0:05           ` Joshua LeVasseur
2006-03-13 20:17 ` Sam Vilain
2006-03-14  0:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2006-03-14  4:01   ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-14  4:04     ` Rik van Riel
2006-03-14  4:55       ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-14  4:13 ` Anthony Liguori
2006-03-14  4:26   ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-14  4:30     ` Rik van Riel
2006-03-14  5:46       ` Zachary Amsden [this message]
2006-03-14 12:44         ` Rik van Riel
2006-03-14 16:22           ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-16 18:58         ` Jan Engelhardt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-17 15:56 Chuck Ebbert
2006-03-17 17:52 ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-20 22:03 Anne Holler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=441658A2.4090905@vmware.com \
    --to=zach@vmware.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=anne@vmware.com \
    --cc=arai@vmware.com \
    --cc=chrisl@vmware.com \
    --cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=dhecht@vmware.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=jlo@vmware.com \
    --cc=jreddy@vmware.com \
    --cc=jtl@ira.uka.de \
    --cc=kmacy@fsmware.com \
    --cc=ksrinivasan@novell.com \
    --cc=leendert@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pratap@vmware.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=wim.coekaerts@oracle.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox