public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: VMI Interface Proposal Documentation for I386, Part 5
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:33:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4418C06D.4050600@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060315234137.GF1919@elf.ucw.cz>

Pavel Machek wrote:
>> from the hypervisor perspective - if the guest enables interrupts, and 
>> you have something pending to deliver, for correctness, you have to 
>> deliver it, right now.  But does the kernel truly require that interrupt 
>> deliver immediately - in most cases, no.  In particular, on the fast 
>>     
>
> I'd say PCI hardware can delay interrupts for any arbitrary
> delay... so if driver expects to get them "immediately", I'd say it is
> broken. It should be enough to deliver them "soon enough", like not
> more than 1msec late...
>   

I agree.  One case we hit that did cause us a bug was local APIC 
delivery of self-IPIs.  I didn't dig too deep into why Linux was unhappy 
without immediate delivery (we deferred delivery here unnecessarily, but 
did not stop it).  I believe this was in SMP specific code that was 
using self-IPIs to regenerate IRQs .

Zach

      reply	other threads:[~2006-03-16  1:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-13 19:56 VMI Interface Proposal Documentation for I386, Part 5 Zachary Amsden
2006-03-14  7:59 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2006-03-14  8:25   ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-14  8:47     ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2006-03-14 16:45       ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-14 17:01       ` Zachary Amsden
2006-03-15 23:41     ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-16  1:33       ` Zachary Amsden [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4418C06D.4050600@vmware.com \
    --to=zach@vmware.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox