From: John Richard Moser <nigelenki@comcast.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Lifetime of flash memory
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:01:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44203179.3090606@comcast.net> (raw)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I have a kind of dumb question. I keep hearing that "USB Flash Memory"
or "Compact Flash Cards" and family have "a limited number of writes"
and will eventually wear out. Recommendations like "DO NOT PUT A SWAP
FILE ON USB MEMORY" have come out of this. In fact, quoting
Documentation/laptop-mode.txt:
* If you're worried about your data, you might want to consider using
a USB memory stick or something like that as a "working area". (Be
aware though that flash memory can only handle a limited number of
writes, and overuse may wear out your memory stick pretty quickly.
Do _not_ use journalling filesystems on flash memory sticks.)
The question I have is, is this really significant? I have heard quoted
that flash memory typically handles something like 3x10^18 writes; and
that compact flash cards, USB drives, SD cards, and family typically
have integrated control chipsets that include wear-leveling algorithms
(built-in flash like in an iPaq does not; hence jffs2). Should we
really care that in about 95 billion years the thing will wear out
(assuming we write its entire capacity once a second)?
I call FUD.
- --
All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the
Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated.
Creative brains are a valuable, limited resource. They shouldn't be
wasted on re-inventing the wheel when there are so many fascinating
new problems waiting out there.
-- Eric Steven Raymond
We will enslave their women, eat their children and rape their
cattle!
-- Evil alien overlord from Blasto
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=48mD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next reply other threads:[~2006-03-21 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-21 17:01 John Richard Moser [this message]
2006-03-21 17:14 ` Lifetime of flash memory David Vrabel
2006-03-21 17:28 ` John Richard Moser
2006-03-21 18:37 ` Paulo Marques
2006-03-21 18:00 ` hackmiester / Hunter Fuller
2006-03-21 18:20 ` Joshua Kugler
2006-03-21 18:40 ` John Richard Moser
2006-03-23 3:46 ` Kalin KOZHUHAROV
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-23 7:49 linux
2006-03-26 13:55 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2006-03-26 16:21 ` linux
2006-03-26 16:36 ` Artem B. Bityutskiy
2006-03-27 16:18 ` Lennart Sorensen
2006-03-27 17:44 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-03-27 18:01 ` Lennart Sorensen
2006-03-28 4:28 ` Sergei Organov
2006-03-28 6:41 ` Magnus Damm
2006-03-28 8:58 ` Sergei Organov
2006-03-28 12:55 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-03-28 13:27 ` Sergei Organov
2006-03-28 13:35 ` Sergei Organov
2006-03-29 1:01 ` linux
2006-03-29 4:33 ` Sergei Organov
2006-03-29 15:56 ` linux
2006-03-30 6:33 ` Sergei Organov
2006-03-30 11:23 ` linux
2006-03-30 12:18 ` Sergei Organov
2006-03-28 0:21 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44203179.3090606@comcast.net \
--to=nigelenki@comcast.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox