public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC, PATCH] avoid some atomics in open()/close() for monothreaded processes
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:23:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4420ED66.5060703@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4420DB55.60803@cosmosbay.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 812 bytes --]

Goal : Avoid some locking/unlocking 'struct files_struct'->file_lock for mono 
threaded processes.

We define files_multithreaded() function .

static inline int files_multithreaded(const struct files_struct *files)
{
        return sizeof(files->file_lock) > 0 && atomic_read(&files->count) > 1;
}

On plain UP kernel (not preemptable nor spinlock debug), this function is a 
const 0, so that gcc can wipe out some code.

On preemptible or SMP, or spinlock debug kernels, the result is true only if 
the ref count is greater than 1 (multi threaded process or /proc/{pid}/fd is 
under investigation by another task)

This patch increases kernel size but pros are worth the cons, as said Linus 
himself, we should increase performance of mono-threaded tasks....

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>

[-- Attachment #2: files_multithreaded.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1790 bytes --]

--- a/include/linux/file.h	2006-03-22 06:23:02.000000000 +0100
+++ b/include/linux/file.h	2006-03-22 07:11:08.000000000 +0100
@@ -42,6 +42,11 @@
 	spinlock_t file_lock;     /* Protects concurrent writers.  Nests inside tsk->alloc_lock */
 };
 
+static inline int files_multithreaded(const struct files_struct *files)
+{
+	return sizeof(files->file_lock) > 0 && atomic_read(&files->count) > 1;
+}
+
 #define files_fdtable(files) (rcu_dereference((files)->fdt))
 
 extern void FASTCALL(__fput(struct file *));
--- a/fs/open.c.orig	2006-03-22 06:24:34.000000000 +0100
+++ b/fs/open.c	2006-03-22 06:30:54.000000000 +0100
@@ -1050,11 +1050,17 @@
 {
 	struct files_struct *files = current->files;
 	struct fdtable *fdt;
-	spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
+	int fl_locked = 0;
+
+	if (files_multithreaded(files)) {
+		spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
+		fl_locked = 1;
+	}
 	fdt = files_fdtable(files);
 	BUG_ON(fdt->fd[fd] != NULL);
 	rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], file);
-	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
+	if (fl_locked)
+		spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
 }
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(fd_install);
@@ -1147,8 +1153,12 @@
 	struct file * filp;
 	struct files_struct *files = current->files;
 	struct fdtable *fdt;
+	int fl_locked = 0;
 
-	spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
+	if (files_multithreaded(files)) {
+		spin_lock(&files->file_lock);
+		fl_locked = 1;
+	}
 	fdt = files_fdtable(files);
 	if (fd >= fdt->max_fds)
 		goto out_unlock;
@@ -1158,11 +1168,13 @@
 	rcu_assign_pointer(fdt->fd[fd], NULL);
 	FD_CLR(fd, fdt->close_on_exec);
 	__put_unused_fd(files, fd);
-	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
+	if (fl_locked)
+		spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
 	return filp_close(filp, files);
 
 out_unlock:
-	spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
+	if (fl_locked)
+		spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
 	return -EBADF;
 }
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-03-22  6:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-12  2:04 More than 8 CPUs detected and CONFIG_X86_PC cannot handle it on 2.6.16-rc6 Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12  5:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-12 11:04   ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12 11:25     ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-12 13:05       ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12 15:35         ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2006-03-12 21:13           ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-12 22:30             ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-13 19:36               ` Ashok Raj
2006-03-13 19:51                 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-13 20:05                   ` Ashok Raj
2006-03-13 22:22                     ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-13 23:04                       ` Ashok Raj
2006-03-15  5:44                         ` Nathan Lynch
2006-03-15  6:18                           ` Shaohua Li
2006-03-15  7:31                             ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-15  9:37                               ` [PATCH] No need to protect current->group_info in sys_getgroups(), in_group_p() and in_egroup_p() Eric Dumazet
2006-03-20 19:09                                 ` [PATCH] Use unsigned int types for a faster bsearch Eric Dumazet
2006-03-22  5:06                                   ` [PATCH] Use __read_mostly on some hot fs variables Eric Dumazet
2006-03-22  5:15                                     ` Nick Piggin
2006-03-22  6:23                                     ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2006-03-22  6:41                                       ` [RFC, PATCH] avoid some atomics in open()/close() for monothreaded processes Andrew Morton
2006-03-22  6:59                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2006-03-22  7:03                                           ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-15 18:09                               ` More than 8 CPUs detected and CONFIG_X86_PC cannot handle it on 2.6.16-rc6 Ashok Raj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4420ED66.5060703@cosmosbay.com \
    --to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox