From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
virtualization@lists.osdl.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@xensource.com>,
ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 35/35] Add Xen virtual block device driver.
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:09:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <442184B9.2020507@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D4B9E8A@liverpoolst.ad.cl.cam.ac.uk>
Ian Pratt wrote:
>> This seems to be pretty evil and creating interesting failure
>> conditions for users who load IDE or SCSI modules. I've seen
>> it trip up a number of people in the past. I think we should
>> only ever use the major number that was actually allocated to us.
>>
>
> We certainly should be pushing everyone toward using the 'xdX' etc
> devices that are allocated to us. However, the installers of certain
> older distros and other user space tools won't except anything other
> than hdX/sdX, so its useful from a compatibility POV even if it never
> goes into mainline, which I agree it probably shouldn't.
>
Then perhaps we should deprecate non xd block devices starting in the
near future (3.0.3?). We probably need to have it deprecated for a few
releases since I think most people are not using xd at this point...
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Ian
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-22 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-22 16:52 [RFC PATCH 35/35] Add Xen virtual block device driver Ian Pratt
2006-03-22 17:09 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2006-03-22 23:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-24 12:17 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-24 12:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-24 13:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-24 13:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-24 13:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-24 15:33 ` Dave C Boutcher
2006-03-24 19:04 ` Mike Christie
2006-03-24 19:19 ` Dave C Boutcher
2006-03-25 0:32 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2006-03-25 0:47 ` Roland Dreier
2006-03-24 15:55 ` Alan Cox
2006-03-25 10:03 ` Rusty Russell
2006-03-27 10:14 ` Peter Chubb
2006-03-23 8:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-23 9:34 ` Keir Fraser
2006-03-23 9:41 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-23 9:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-09 8:49 [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support Chris Wright
2006-05-09 7:00 ` [RFC PATCH 35/35] Add Xen virtual block device driver Chris Wright
2006-05-09 12:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-03-22 6:30 [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support Chris Wright
2006-03-22 6:31 ` [RFC PATCH 35/35] Add Xen virtual block device driver Chris Wright
2006-03-22 16:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2006-03-22 16:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-03-27 8:42 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=442184B9.2020507@us.ibm.com \
--to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=ian.pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=ian.pratt@xensource.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox