From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@cyclades.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swsusp: separate swap-writing/reading code
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:48:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <442325DA.80300@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603232253.01025.rjw@sisk.pl>
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> I agree it probably may be improved. Still it seems to be good enough. Further,
> it's more efficient than the previous solution, so I consider it as an improvement.
> Also this code has been tested for quite some time in -mm and appears to
> behave properly, at least we haven't got any bug reports related to it so far.
I find the in-kernel swsusp to be quite slow, and it seems to use
an awful lot of memory for book-keeping. So count that as encouragement
to improve the performance when you can.
> Currently I'm not working on any better solution. If you can provide any
> patches to implement one, please submit them, but I think they'll have to be
> tested for as long as this code, in -mm.
It would be *really nice* if you guys could stop being so underhandedly
nasty in every single reply to anything from Nigel.
He really is trying to help, you know.
Cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-23 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200603231702.k2NH2OSC006774@hera.kernel.org>
2006-03-23 21:13 ` [PATCH] swsusp: separate swap-writing/reading code Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-23 21:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-23 22:48 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2006-03-23 23:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-03-27 10:26 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-27 10:43 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-27 23:15 ` regular swsusp flamewar [was Re: [PATCH] swsusp: separate swap-writing/reading code] Pavel Machek
2006-03-27 23:36 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-28 1:18 ` regular swsusp flamewar Harald Arnesen
2006-03-28 9:15 ` regular swsusp flamewar [was Re: [PATCH] swsusp: separate swap-writing/reading code] Pavel Machek
2006-03-28 9:16 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-28 10:28 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-03-28 1:16 ` regular swsusp flamewar Harald Arnesen
2006-03-28 9:13 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-23 23:58 ` [PATCH] swsusp: separate swap-writing/reading code Andrew Morton
2006-03-24 0:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=442325DA.80300@rtr.ca \
--to=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox