From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932148AbWCZWht (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:37:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932151AbWCZWht (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:37:49 -0500 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:28644 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932148AbWCZWht (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 17:37:49 -0500 Message-ID: <442717A6.3060708@us.ibm.com> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 14:37:26 -0800 From: Badari Pulavarty User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020508 Netscape6/6.2.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sho@tnes.nec.co.jp CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 2/2] ext2/3: Support2^32-1blocks(e2fsprogs) References: <20060325223358sho@rifu.tnes.nec.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org sho@tnes.nec.co.jp wrote: >Hi, > >>More information. I ran the test with "-onoreservation" thinking that >>the patch didn't address "reservation code" issues and I still ran >>into block allocation problems. Hope this helps. >> > >As you said, the previous patches were broken because of my mailer, >and part of them would be rejected. >I'm re-sending them; I have not changed them other than the mailer. >Could you try new patches and check what happened? >I have run fsx with these patches several times and the problems >weren't reproduced. > >Signed-off-by: Takashi Sato sho@tnes.nec.co.jp >--- > Sure. I will give it a spin. BTW, did you really test them with > 8TB filesystem ? I ran bunch of "dd"s to create few files and then ran mutiple copies of "fsx" tests. Then I run into problems in few seconds of the tests. Thanks, Badari >