Re: 2.6.17-rc1 compile failure

[Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 935 bytes --]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Horst von Brand napsal(a):
> It ends with:
> 
>   CC      security/selinux/xfrm.o
>   security/selinux/xfrm.c: In function â??selinux_socket_getpeer_dgramâ??:
>   security/selinux/xfrm.c:284: error: â??struct sec_pathâ?? has no member named â??xâ??
>   security/selinux/xfrm.c: In function â??selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skbâ??:
>   security/selinux/xfrm.c:317: error: â??struct sec_pathâ?? has no member named â??xâ??
>   make[2]: *** [security/selinux/xfrm.o] Error 1
Could you test attached patch?

thanks,
- --
Jiri Slaby         www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby
\_.-^-._   jirislaby@gmail.com   _.-^-._/
B67499670407CE62ACC8 22A032CC55C339D47A7E
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEMTxDMsxVwznUen4RAgLCAJ9WEAU018cecP1emeMZKfCTrttVeQCgric6
g9Cq+yh5IvmVJGHqlVsIEXs=
=9MLb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[-- Attachment #2: selinux-xfrm.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1317 bytes --]

SELinux-xfrm-compilation-fix

sec_path struct no longer contains sec_decap_state struct, but only
xfrm_state.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>

---
commit 87b9e5f728ab1f5f805f1db9d96d569b1218b611
tree 60d080432a06f8bdddb8665a89dd825a33b2b01f
parent 9e4a4f43bab1268fc459295a673d00470d5e150d
author Jiri Slaby <ku@bellona.localdomain> Mon, 03 Apr 2006 17:11:07 +0159
committer Jiri Slaby <ku@bellona.localdomain> Mon, 03 Apr 2006 17:11:07 +0159

 security/selinux/xfrm.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/selinux/xfrm.c b/security/selinux/xfrm.c
index dfab6c8..abe99d8 100644
--- a/security/selinux/xfrm.c
+++ b/security/selinux/xfrm.c
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ u32 selinux_socket_getpeer_dgram(struct 
 		int i;
 
 		for (i = sp->len-1; i >= 0; i--) {
-			struct xfrm_state *x = sp->x[i].xvec;
+			struct xfrm_state *x = sp->xvec[i];
 			if (selinux_authorizable_xfrm(x)) {
 				struct xfrm_sec_ctx *ctx = x->security;
 				return ctx->ctx_sid;
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ int selinux_xfrm_sock_rcv_skb(u32 isec_s
 		 *  Only need to verify the existence of an authorizable sp.
 		 */
 		for (i = 0; i < sp->len; i++) {
-			struct xfrm_state *x = sp->x[i].xvec;
+			struct xfrm_state *x = sp->xvec[i];
 
 			if (x && selinux_authorizable_xfrm(x))
 				goto accept;