From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964972AbWDDCbk (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2006 22:31:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964970AbWDDCbk (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2006 22:31:40 -0400 Received: from 64-30-195-78.dsl.linkline.com ([64.30.195.78]:36044 "EHLO jg555.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964972AbWDDCbj (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Apr 2006 22:31:39 -0400 Message-ID: <4431DA7D.80907@jg555.com> Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 19:31:25 -0700 From: Jim Gifford User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: LKML Subject: Header Sanitizing Project Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I've been working on a way to sanitize the headers. I've come up with a process, that works for what I do, and hope to expand it with all the positive feedback I've been getting. The product of this research is at http://ftp.jg555.com/headers/headers2, and has a requirement of unifdef, which is listed in the script itself. When I was working on this project, I've noticed a lot of headers are missing minor little things. Example. most if the if_*.h files are missing asm/types.h. linux/input.h has a complete procedure that should be under __KERNEL__. Should I submit these as bugs along with the patches? I have no problem submitting them. Please advise me on the proper procedure on the findings, I can provide more details, but everything is in my little script for sanitizing the headers. Thank you for all your help Jim Gifford maillist@jg555.com