public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com, shuah@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
	peternewman@google.com, babu.moger@amd.com,
	"Maciej Wieczór-Retman" <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] selftests/resctrl: Use cache size to determine "fill_buf" buffer size
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 14:25:25 +0300 (EEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4434b263-9049-3d44-6b41-a840b39205cd@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d357189fe0695b2140fc03efde75edc6fa0c88c6.1724970211.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com>

On Thu, 29 Aug 2024, Reinette Chatre wrote:

> By default the MBM and MBA tests use the "fill_buf" benchmark to
> read from a buffer with the goal to measure the memory bandwidth
> generated by this buffer access.
> 
> Care should be taken when sizing the buffer used by the "fill_buf"
> benchmark. If the buffer is small enough to fit in the cache then
> it cannot be expected that the benchmark will generate much memory
> bandwidth. For example, on a system with 320MB L3 cache the existing
> hardcoded default of 250MB is insufficient.
> 
> Use the measured cache size to determine a buffer size that can be
> expected to trigger memory access while keeping the existing default
> as minimum that has been appropriate for testing so far.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c | 8 +++++++-
>  tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c | 8 +++++++-
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
> index 8ad433495f61..cad473b81a64 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mba_test.c
> @@ -170,11 +170,17 @@ static int mba_run_test(const struct resctrl_test *test, const struct user_param
>  		.setup		= mba_setup,
>  		.measure	= mba_measure,
>  	};
> +	unsigned long cache_total_size = 0;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	remove(RESULT_FILE_NAME);
>  
> -	param.fill_buf.buf_size = DEFAULT_SPAN;
> +	ret = get_cache_size(uparams->cpu, "L3", &cache_total_size);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	param.fill_buf.buf_size = cache_total_size > DEFAULT_SPAN ?
> +				  cache_total_size * 2 : DEFAULT_SPAN;

Should the check leave a bit of safeguard so that the buf_size is at 
least 2x (or x1.25 or some other factor)?

In here buf_size immediate jumps from 1x -> 2x when cache_total_size goes 
from DEFAULT_SPAN to DEFAULT_SPAN+1 (obviously L3 size won't be odd like 
that but I think you get my point).

Also, user might want to override this as mentioned in my reply to the 
previous patch.

-- 
 i.

>  	param.fill_buf.memflush = 1;
>  	param.fill_buf.operation = 0;
>  	param.fill_buf.once = false;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> index b6883f274c74..734bfa4f42b3 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c
> @@ -138,11 +138,17 @@ static int mbm_run_test(const struct resctrl_test *test, const struct user_param
>  		.setup		= mbm_setup,
>  		.measure	= mbm_measure,
>  	};
> +	unsigned long cache_total_size = 0;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	remove(RESULT_FILE_NAME);
>  
> -	param.fill_buf.buf_size = DEFAULT_SPAN;
> +	ret = get_cache_size(uparams->cpu, "L3", &cache_total_size);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	param.fill_buf.buf_size = cache_total_size > DEFAULT_SPAN ?
> +				  cache_total_size * 2 : DEFAULT_SPAN;
>  	param.fill_buf.memflush = 1;
>  	param.fill_buf.operation = 0;
>  	param.fill_buf.once = false;
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-30 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-29 22:52 [PATCH 0/6] selftests/resctrl: Support diverse platforms with MBM and MBA tests Reinette Chatre
2024-08-29 22:52 ` [PATCH 1/6] selftests/resctrl: Fix sparse warnings Reinette Chatre
2024-08-30 10:29   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-08-29 22:52 ` [PATCH 2/6] selftests/resctrl: Ensure measurements skip initialization of default benchmark Reinette Chatre
2024-08-30 10:56   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-08-30 16:00     ` Reinette Chatre
2024-09-04 11:57       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-09-04 21:15         ` Reinette Chatre
2024-09-05 12:10           ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-09-05 18:08             ` Reinette Chatre
2024-09-06 10:00               ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-09-07  0:05                 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-09-09 12:52                   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-08-29 22:52 ` [PATCH 3/6] selftests/resctrl: Simplify benchmark parameter passing Reinette Chatre
2024-08-30 11:13   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-08-30 16:01     ` Reinette Chatre
2024-08-29 22:52 ` [PATCH 4/6] selftests/resctrl: Use cache size to determine "fill_buf" buffer size Reinette Chatre
2024-08-30 11:25   ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2024-08-30 16:00     ` Reinette Chatre
2024-08-29 22:52 ` [PATCH 5/6] selftests/resctrl: Do not compare performance counters and resctrl at low bandwidth Reinette Chatre
2024-08-30 11:42   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-08-30 16:00     ` Reinette Chatre
2024-09-04 11:43       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-09-04 21:15         ` Reinette Chatre
2024-09-05 11:45           ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-09-05 18:08             ` Reinette Chatre
2024-09-06  8:44               ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-09-07  0:05                 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-09-09  8:13                   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-08-29 22:52 ` [PATCH 6/6] selftests/resctrl: Keep results from first test run Reinette Chatre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4434b263-9049-3d44-6b41-a840b39205cd@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox