From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750841AbWDKSOF (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2006 14:14:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750876AbWDKSOF (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2006 14:14:05 -0400 Received: from [62.205.161.221] ([62.205.161.221]:36800 "EHLO kir.sacred.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750841AbWDKSOE (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2006 14:14:04 -0400 Message-ID: <443BF1A6.5040805@openvz.org> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 22:12:54 +0400 From: Kir Kolyshkin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20060217) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Herbert Poetzl CC: Kirill Korotaev , Bill Davidsen , Kir Kolyshkin , akpm@osdl.org, Nick Piggin , sam@vilain.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , serue@us.ibm.com, Alexey Kuznetsov Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: [RFC] Virtualization steps References: <1143228339.19152.91.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200603282029.AA00927@bbb-jz5c7z9hn9y.digitalinfra.co.jp> <4429A17D.2050506@openvz.org> <443151B4.7010401@tmr.com> <443B873B.9040908@sw.ru> <20060411162055.GA22367@MAIL.13thfloor.at> In-Reply-To: <20060411162055.GA22367@MAIL.13thfloor.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Herbert Poetzl wrote: >I think that zero downtime is some kind of marketing >buzzword here, and has nothing to do with the actual >time the migration takes, which will probably be >around 20 seconds or so (for larger guests) ... > > IMO it is called "zero downtime" because from the user's point of view there is no downtime, i.e. network connections are preserved, so what user sees is a delay in processing, not a downtime.