From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751348AbWDKTz2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:55:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751343AbWDKTz2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:55:28 -0400 Received: from mailer2.psc.edu ([128.182.66.106]:62419 "EHLO mailer2.psc.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751348AbWDKTz1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:55:27 -0400 Message-ID: <443C09A7.2040900@psc.edu> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:55:19 -0400 From: John Heffner User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Drake CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.17 regression: Very slow net transfer from some hosts References: <443C03E6.7080202@gentoo.org> <443C024C.2070107@psc.edu> <443C0B74.50305@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <443C0B74.50305@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Daniel Drake wrote: > John Heffner wrote: >> I'm not seeing this behavior myself. What are the values of >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem, tcp_rmem, and tcp_mem? How much memory >> does this system have? (A binary tcpdump might be good, too.) > > tcp_wmem: 4096 16384 131072 > tcp_rmem: 4096 87380 174760 > tcp_mem: 98304 131072 196608 These are (I assume) with the patch reversed. What are the values with the patch applied? Thanks, -John