From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751029AbWDLJQu (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:16:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751033AbWDLJQu (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:16:50 -0400 Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.146]:47752 "EHLO e6.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751011AbWDLJQu (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:16:50 -0400 Message-ID: <443CC586.6060105@de.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 11:16:54 +0200 From: Carsten Otte Reply-To: carsteno@de.ibm.com Organization: IBM Deutschland User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jes Sorensen CC: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , Nick Piggin , bjorn_helgaas@hp.com Subject: Re: [patch] do_no_pfn handler References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jes Sorensen wrote: > Linus> At the very least, it would also need a > Linus> BUG_ON(is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags)); > > Added - I am not sure how this will affect Carsten's situation based > on the further discussion in this thread, however if something changes > at that point I assume we can modify the limitation at a later stage. Fine with me.