public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent CARON <lcaron@apartia.fr>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Openswan, iptables (fiaif) and 2.6.16 kernel
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:32:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <443F9667.2070701@apartia.fr> (raw)

Hi,

I'm running an openswan gateway for quite a long time now.

I have used 2.4.X and 2.6.X kernels without any problem until i decided 
to upgrade to 2.6.16 kernel.

Summary of problem:

Under 2.6.15 everything is fine

Under 2.6.16 my tunnels establish well, but i can't even ping a single 
computer located on the other end of the tunnel when the firewall is up.
Disabling the firewall solves the problem (but is not an option for me).

$ cat ip_conntrack | grep 192.168.10
icmp     1 8 src=192.168.0.192 dst=192.168.10.1 type=8 code=0 id=793 
packets=4 bytes=116 [UNREPLIED] src=192.168.10.1 dst=XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX 
type=0 code=0 id=793 packets=0 bytes=0 mark=0 use=1

192.168.0.0/24 is my lan subnet (natted so that lan computers can access 
the internet through the public ip address)
192.168.0.192 is a workstation on my lan
192.168.10.0/24 is the other subnet
XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX is my public ip address


If i disable the nat of 192.168.0.0/24, i can ping the other end.

Re-enabling the nat however disables the ability to ping the other end.

Seems iptables is trying to nat packets the wrong way :$, or that I 
missed a major change in 2.6.16.

Do anyone have any clue about this weiredness?

Thanks

Laurent
_______________________________________________
Users@openswan.org
http://lists.openswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Building and Integrating Virtual Private Networks with Openswan: 
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1904811256/104-3099591-2946327?n=283155


             reply	other threads:[~2006-04-14 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-14 12:32 Laurent CARON [this message]
2006-04-15 15:58 ` Openswan, iptables (fiaif) and 2.6.16 kernel Patrick McHardy
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-15 16:55 Andrey Borzenkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=443F9667.2070701@apartia.fr \
    --to=lcaron@apartia.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox