Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks

Kazuki Omo(Company)
2006-04-18T13:05:51Z

Hi,

This is my first post. My name is OMO, member of LIDS development team.
(LIDS is not IDS. I think the name sometime will cause
misunderstanding.)

Actually, LIDS is using LSM Framework from kernel-2.6.0 and
keeps developing new one.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-security-module&m=113472048023966&w=2

OMO

Stephen Smalley wrote: (2006/04/18 03:15):
> On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 11:02 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
>>--- Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Or, better, remove LSM itself ;)
>>>
>>>Seriously that makes a lot of sense. All other
>>>modules people have come up
>>>with over the last years are irrelevant and/or
>>>broken by design.
>>
>>Didn't you mean "Bah!" (waves paw)?
>>
>>I understand the enthusiasm that the SELinux
>>following demonstrates for the technology.
>>I do not appreciate the bashing of alternatives.
>
>
> Then provide a counterexample.
>

--
Kazuki Omo: k-omo@10art-ni.co.jp
Group Manager, OSS Technology Group, Linux Technology
LIDS Japanese Information:
Japanese: http://www.selinux.gr.jp/LIDS-JP/index.html
English: http://www.selinux.gr.jp/LIDS-JP/LIDS_en/index.html