public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Hua Zhong <hzhong@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Paul Mackerras'" <paulus@samba.org>,
	"'Pekka Enberg'" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	"'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@osdl.org>,
	"'James Morris'" <jmorris@namei.org>,
	dwalker@mvista.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kfree(NULL)
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 05:25:41 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <444A8335.6030407@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001b01c66642$0abdbf80$0200a8c0@nuitysystems.com>

Hua Zhong wrote:
>>It can reduce readability of the code [unless it is used in 
>>error path simplification, kfree(something) usually suggests 
>>kfree-an-object].
> 
> 
> Consistency in coding style improves readability. Redundancy reduces readability.
> 
> The interface is simple and clear, and has been documented for decades, that is kfree (and free) accepts NULL. There is no ambiguity
> here.
> 
> If you think "if (obj) kfree (obj);" is more readable than "kfree(obj);", fix the API to enforce it.
> 
> But if the kernel tree is full of "some caller checks NULL while others not", I hardly see it as readable. It'd just be confusing.
>  
> 
>>I don't actually like kfree(NULL) any time except error 
>>paths. It is subjective, not crazy talk.
> 
> 
> Documented interface is not subjective.

That's great. I don't know quite how to reply, or even if I should
if you don't read what I write.

-- 
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com 

  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-22 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-21  7:03 kfree(NULL) Daniel Walker
2006-04-21  7:22 ` kfree(NULL) James Morris
2006-04-21  8:54   ` kfree(NULL) Andrew Morton
2006-04-21 13:56     ` kfree(NULL) Vernon Mauery
2006-04-21 14:07       ` kfree(NULL) Dmitry Fedorov
2006-04-21 15:07         ` kfree(NULL) Jan Engelhardt
2006-04-21 19:22           ` kfree(NULL) Adrian Bunk
2006-04-21 20:30             ` kfree(NULL) Vernon Mauery
2006-04-21 20:54               ` kfree(NULL) Steven Rostedt
2006-04-21 21:38               ` kfree(NULL) Adrian Bunk
2006-04-22 11:56               ` kfree(NULL) Jörn Engel
2006-04-21 23:55     ` kfree(NULL) Paul Mackerras
2006-04-22  7:43       ` kfree(NULL) Pekka Enberg
2006-04-22  8:48         ` kfree(NULL) Paul Mackerras
2006-04-22 15:02           ` kfree(NULL) Pekka Enberg
2006-04-22 18:57           ` kfree(NULL) Hua Zhong
2006-04-22 19:05             ` kfree(NULL) Nick Piggin
2006-04-22 19:22               ` kfree(NULL) Hua Zhong
2006-04-22 19:25                 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2006-04-22 20:18                   ` kfree(NULL) Jan Engelhardt
2006-04-23 16:50               ` kfree(NULL) Steven Rostedt
2006-04-22 11:34       ` kfree(NULL) Jesper Juhl
2006-04-21 14:06   ` kfree(NULL) Daniel Walker
     [not found] <63XWg-1IL-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <63YfP-26I-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <63ZEY-45n-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-04-21 15:25     ` kfree(NULL) Tilman Schmidt
2006-04-21 16:03       ` kfree(NULL) Daniel Walker
2006-04-21 17:48         ` kfree(NULL) Jörn Engel
2006-04-21 18:00         ` kfree(NULL) Steven Rostedt
2006-04-21 18:42           ` kfree(NULL) Daniel Walker
2006-04-21 18:56             ` kfree(NULL) Steven Rostedt
2006-04-21 19:26           ` kfree(NULL) Andrew Morton
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-21 21:02 kfree(NULL) Hua Zhong
2006-04-21 21:11 ` kfree(NULL) Daniel Walker
2006-04-21 21:36   ` kfree(NULL) Michael Buesch
2006-04-21 21:42 ` kfree(NULL) Andrew Morton
2006-04-21 21:48   ` kfree(NULL) Andrew Morton
2006-04-21 22:53   ` kfree(NULL) Hua Zhong
2006-04-21 22:58     ` kfree(NULL) Daniel Walker
2006-04-21 23:03       ` kfree(NULL) Hua Zhong
2006-04-21 23:25     ` kfree(NULL) Andrew Morton
2006-04-21 23:27     ` kfree(NULL) Andrew Morton
2006-04-22 11:18   ` kfree(NULL) Jan Engelhardt
2006-04-22 12:05 kfree(NULL) linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=444A8335.6030407@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=hzhong@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox