From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751509AbWDXEkl (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:40:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751511AbWDXEkl (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:40:41 -0400 Received: from 7ka-campus-gw.mipt.ru ([194.85.83.97]:61139 "EHLO 7ka-campus-gw.mipt.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751509AbWDXEkk (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:40:40 -0400 Message-ID: <444C5698.5080503@openvz.org> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:39:52 +0400 From: Kirill Korotaev User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050715) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: KUROSAWA Takahiro CC: sekharan@us.ibm.com, akpm@osdl.org, haveblue@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, Valerie.Clement@bull.net Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul References: <20060421022411.6145.83939.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <1145630992.3373.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1145638722.14804.0.camel@linuxchandra> <20060421155727.4212c41c.akpm@osdl.org> <1145670536.15389.132.camel@linuxchandra> <20060421191340.0b218c81.akpm@osdl.org> <1145683725.21231.15.camel@linuxchandra> <20060424011053.B89707402F@sv1.valinux.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20060424011053.B89707402F@sv1.valinux.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>> pzone based memory controller: >>>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ckrm-tech&m=113867467006531&w=2 >>> From a super-quick scan that looks saner. Is it effective? Is this the >>> way you're planning on proceeding? >> Yes, it is effective, and the reclamation is O(1) too. It has couple of >> problems by design, (1) doesn't handle shared pages and (2) doesn't >> provide support for both min_shares and max_shares. > > Right. I wanted to show proof-of-cencept of the pzone based controller > and implemented minimal features necessary as the memory controller. > So, the pzone based controller still needs development and some cleanup. Just out of curiosity, how it was meassured that it is effective? How does it work when there is a global memory shortage in the system? Thanks, Kirill