* Re: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/9] CPU controller - Documents how the controller works
@ 2006-04-24 9:23 Martin Andersson
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Martin Andersson @ 2006-04-24 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Galbraith; +Cc: linux-kernel
> A better way to achieve the desired group cpu usage IMHO would be to
> adjust nice level of members at slice refresh time. This way, you get
> the timeslice scaling and priority adjustment all in one.
>
> (I think I would do both actually, with nice level being preferred such
> that dynamic priority spread within the group isn't flattened, which can
> cause terminal starvation within the group, unless really required.)
I am actually working on something more or less like that as part of my
licentiate (half time PhD) thesis. In the thesis I want to control CPU
resources using a control theoretic approach. The results so far are
very promising, but my code is not very mature yet. I plan to have my
thesis ready during this summer, so if anyone is interested I can mail
you a copy. If I have the time after that, I will try to incorporate my
code into the CKRM framework.
/Martin Andersson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2006-04-24 9:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-04-24 9:23 Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/9] CPU controller - Documents how the controller works Martin Andersson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox