Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul

Matt Helsley
2006-04-23T09:31:43Z

On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 23:52 -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
> > (btw, using the term "class" to identify a group of tasks isn't very
> > comfortable - it's an instance, not a class...)
>
> Bless you. I objected to the term 'class' a long time ago, but failed
> to advance my case in a successful fashion.

Well, I wouldn't say you were entirely unsuccessful. I distinctly
remembered your case and I tried to think of suitable names during the
recent changes. Please take a look at the latest set of patches and see
if you think the names are clearer.

> Matt replied:
> > "resource group"?
>
> Nice.

Cheers,
-Matt Helsley