From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
To: tj@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: cancel_delayed_work() semantics broken?
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:00:03 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <444a6439-b1a4-4740-9e7e-bc37267cfe73@default> (raw)
Hi Tejun --
Forgive me if I am missing something, but it appears
that your commit: 57b30ae77bf00d2318df711ef9a4d2a9be0a3a2a
(workqueue: reimplement cancel_delayed_work() using try_to_grab_pending())
has subtly broken the semantics of the function. If
work was idle, according to the comment, it should
return false, correct?
It appears that very few callsites check the return value,
but ramster does, as does ocfs2 from whence the code at the
ramster callsite was derived. They both decrement
a kref count based on the return value.
I am still looking at try_to_grab_pending as I am not sure
if its semantics have also changed.
Thanks,
Dan
Signed-off-by: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index d951daa..042d221 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -2982,7 +2982,7 @@ bool cancel_delayed_work(struct delayed_work *dwork)
set_work_cpu_and_clear_pending(&dwork->work, work_cpu(&dwork->work));
local_irq_restore(flags);
- return true;
+ return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(cancel_delayed_work);
next reply other threads:[~2012-10-18 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-18 23:00 Dan Magenheimer [this message]
2012-10-18 23:25 ` cancel_delayed_work() semantics broken? Tejun Heo
2012-10-18 23:39 ` [PATCH] workqueue: cancel_delayed_work() should return %NULL if work item is idle Tejun Heo
2012-10-29 9:47 ` Andrei Emeltchenko
2012-10-29 15:14 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=444a6439-b1a4-4740-9e7e-bc37267cfe73@default \
--to=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox