From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965207AbWD1Lq3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 07:46:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965208AbWD1Lq3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 07:46:29 -0400 Received: from horus.tecnoera.com ([200.24.235.2]:27316 "EHLO horus.tecnoera.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965207AbWD1Lq2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 07:46:28 -0400 Message-ID: <44520085.3030909@tecnoera.com> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 07:46:13 -0400 From: Juan Pablo Abuyeres User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: linux/iptables + smp question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi guys, I've been using an old single processor / linux 2.4 iptables based firewall for a few years. Now it's time to upgrade that machine, so, I am wondering, would it be of real benefit if I put a two-processor system for a firewall? This machine is going to have 4 NICs, it's going to make routing (lots of routes), and firewall (iptables). I don't know if these kind of tasks take advantage from a multiple-processor architecture. Please enlighten me :) Thank you!