From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751858AbWD2Ixc (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 04:53:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751860AbWD2Ixc (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 04:53:32 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com ([64.233.162.205]:10762 "EHLO nz-out-0102.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751858AbWD2Ixb (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 04:53:31 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kxNKmSItsI4F87+IENBDk4HOov+6zNL48EyH0I3p0BZx/TtNRf7o/pRsFR2Sl9YVDlc3SLqe6SfZH2Et3hYSyoD2XP9p62yAv7yVpSlmSUMxeEspPuOBDVcP5vM4ccDMY8po0AoV/DAKwTUCQ7kJKsR0tUnBCSK+XDaOF3wMMnI= Message-ID: <44539ABE.6050007@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:56:30 +0000 From: Alan Camus User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu CC: khaled MOHAMMED atteya , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: I hope to be kernel developer ,in i386 arch References: <7f9112a50604281454k27d60e4cm61d5bb659c3f8359@mail.gmail.com> <200604290536.k3T5arZs012263@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <200604290536.k3T5arZs012263@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:54:28 +0300, khaled MOHAMMED atteya said: > >> HELLO >> I hope to be kernel developer ,in i386 arch. >> > > Do you plan to be actively developing code in the arch/i386 tree, or are > you just developing on systems that happen to be x86 boxes? The difference > is crucial. > I want to be actively developing code in the arch/i386 or arch/x86_64 tree ... and plan to optimize the kernel for theses CPUs ... any advice ? thanks . --alan