From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750900AbWD3CbM (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 22:31:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750902AbWD3CbM (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 22:31:12 -0400 Received: from pproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.166.176]:54442 "EHLO pproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750898AbWD3CbL (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 22:31:11 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QoKU3y9HjLeQ39qIFQPFP+EDe1itDPRcrOSxQP/UfkBTtIUqptiKVSvI0UmrYDicvg3C2PXPOZ1bH8v2pCkxSUCuZMS5JHwEU0TRAtVN59qJ2Wdua6DwtphWQfwBVK63zExRpEtElCk8iwkCo1YuFJSKoXBmRbMZbzELhaKb2jA= Message-ID: <44542184.6030209@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 11:31:32 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jason CC: Jan Dittmer , mogensv@vip.cybercity.dk, jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: sata_sil24 resetting controller... References: <20060427185813.GB6039@l4x.org> <4451594D.5060705@gmail.com> <4452AFAF.3000101@l4x.org> <4452B165.6090905@gmail.com> <445329A0.8020001@vip.cybercity.dk> <44533AA0.5060002@l4x.org> <380087de0604291922u476f23bdsf9cd95081e1378a5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <380087de0604291922u476f23bdsf9cd95081e1378a5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org jason wrote: > Jan Dittmer wrote > > >> I shifted the sata card into a 66MHz, 32bit PCI slot now and the >> problems went away. Just for the record, this is an Asus PU-DLS >> mainboard with E7501 chipset. Now I can dd from all devices without >> any error messages, giving me about 360mb/s continuous throughput for >> 6 devices which isn't that bad I suppose. >> The card gets assigned irq 22 in both configurations but in the >> latter the irq is shared with the on-board usb-uhci controller >> which somehow seems to work better... > > push a 64bit+ 133Mhz+ non bridge PCI-X device into a 32bit slot? Is it > right? > I am confused... > Well, it's not optimal, but most PCI-X cards including sil3124 are backward compatible with PCI, so.... -- tejun