From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
coreteam@netfilter.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [netfilter-core] Re: [lockup] 2.6.17-rc3: netfilter/sctp: lockup in sctp_new(), do_basic_checks()
Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 15:54:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4457648C.6020100@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060502134053.GA30917@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> thinking about it, what prevents the SCTP chunk's len field from being
> zero, and thus causing an infinite loop in for_each_sctp_chunk()? The
> patch below should fix that.
>
> Ingo
>
> ----
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> fix infinite loop in the SCTP-netfilter code: check SCTP chunk size to
> guarantee progress of for_each_sctp_chunk(). (all other uses of
> for_each_sctp_chunk() are preceded by do_basic_checks(), so this fix
> should be complete.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> Index: linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
> +++ linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
> @@ -227,6 +227,15 @@ static int do_basic_checks(struct ip_con
> flag = 0;
>
> for_each_sctp_chunk (skb, sch, _sch, offset, count) {
> + unsigned int len = (htons(sch->length) + 3) & ~3;
> +
> + /*
> + * Dont get into a loop with zero-sized or negative
> + * length values:
> + */
> + if (!len || len >= skb->len)
> + goto fail;
> +
I just came up with a similar fix :) I think I'm going to take
my own patch though because its IMO slightly nicer. Thanks anyway.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-02 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-02 11:34 [lockup] 2.6.17-rc3: netfilter/sctp: lockup in sctp_new(), do_basic_checks() Ingo Molnar
2006-05-02 13:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-02 13:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-02 13:54 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2006-05-02 14:01 ` [netfilter-core] " Ingo Molnar
2006-05-02 13:57 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-02 14:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-02 14:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-02 14:29 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-02 14:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-02 14:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-02 14:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-02 14:40 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-02 13:45 ` [netfilter-core] " Patrick McHardy
2006-05-02 15:34 ` Marcel Holtmann
2006-05-02 15:55 ` [netfilter-core] " Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4457648C.6020100@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox