From: Vasily Averin <vvs@sw.ru>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Neela.Kolli@engenio.com,
Atul Mukker <Atul.Mukker@lsil.com>,
Seokmann.Ju@lsil.com, sreenib@lsil.com, devel@openvz.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: megaraid_mbox: garbage in file
Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 22:17:29 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <445B96B9.20100@sw.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1146844763.9848.17.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 09:37 +0400, Vasily Averin wrote:
>>The issue is that the correctly finished scsi read command return me garbage
>>(repeated 0 ...127 -- see hexdump in my first letter) instead correct file content.
>>"attempt to access beyond end of device" messages occurs due the same garbage
>>readed from the Indirect block. I found this garbage present in data buffers
>>beginning at megaraid driver functions.
>>
>>I would note that if I read the same file by using dd with bs=1024 or bs=512 --
>>I get correct file content.
>>
>>When I use kernel with 4Gb memory limit -- the same cat command return me
>>correct file content too, without any garbage.
>>
>>Question is what it is the strange garbage? Have you seen it earlier?
>>Is it possible that it is some driver-related issue or it is broken hardware?
>>And why I can workaround this issue by using only 4Gb memory?
>
> This is really odd ... if the controller can't reach *any* memory above
> 32 bits, then, on an 8GB machine you'd expect corruption all over the
> place since most user pages come from the top of highmem.
>
> The first thing to try, since you have an opteron system, is to get rid
> of highmem entirely and use a 64 bit kernel (just to make sure we're not
> running into some annoying dma_addr_t conversion problem).
Unfortunately it is customers node, and I'm not able to re-install 64-bit
distribution to load 64-bit kernel. Of course I'll ask customer about this, but
it will be done later.
> Then, I
> suppose if that doesn't work, try printing out the actual contents of
> the sg list to see what the physical memory location of the page
> containing the corrupt block is.
I've already done such experiment:
On 2.6.8-based virtuozzo kernel I've added following code to
megaraid_mbox_display_scb function:
virt = page_address(sg[i].page) + sg[i].offset;
printk("mbox sg%d: page %p off %d addr %llx len %d "
"virt %p first %08x page->flags %08x\n",
i, sg[i].page, sg[i].offset, sg[i].dma_address, sg[i].length,
virt, virt == NULL ? 0: *(int *)virt, sg[i].page->flags);
and get the following results
May 4 02:51:38 vpsn002 kernel:
megaraid mailbox: status:0x0 cmd:0xa7 id:0x25 sec:0x1a
lba:0x33f624ac addr:0xffffffff ld:128 sg:4
scsi cmnd: 0x28 0x00 0x33 0xf6 0x24 0xac 0x00 0x00 0x1a 0x00
mbox request_buffer eafde340 use_sg 4
mbox sg0: page 077a0474 off 0 addr 1fd575000 len 4096 virt ff15a000
first 03020100 page->flags 40020101
mbox sg1: page 077b5738 off 0 addr 1fdede000 len 4096 virt ff141000
first 03020100 page->flags 40020101
mbox sg2: page 077ad500 off 0 addr 1fdb40000 len 4096 virt ff056000
first 03020100 page->flags 40020101
mbox sg3: page 030d46e8 off 1024 addr 5e6a400 len 1024 virt 07e6a400
first 03020100 page->flags 20001004
"first 03020100" shows that data in the all sg buffers is already corrupted.
Also I would note that page for last 1Kb buffer is not Highmem.
If you want I can reproduce this experiment on 2.6.16 kernel too.
> This could also be a firmware problem, I suppose, but I haven't seen any
> similar reports.
Thank you,
Vasily Averin
SWsoft Virtuozzo/OpenVZ Linux kernel team
next parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-05 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <445A4C8F.5030204@sw.ru>
[not found] ` <1146783568.22932.105.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
[not found] ` <445AE4A5.8070202@sw.ru>
[not found] ` <1146844763.9848.17.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
2006-05-05 18:17 ` Vasily Averin [this message]
2006-05-05 20:05 ` megaraid_mbox: garbage in file James Bottomley
2006-05-05 23:43 ` Vasily Averin
2006-05-05 19:59 Ju, Seokmann
2006-05-05 23:35 ` Vasily Averin
2006-05-12 4:18 ` Vasily Averin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-12 12:19 Ju, Seokmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=445B96B9.20100@sw.ru \
--to=vvs@sw.ru \
--cc=Atul.Mukker@lsil.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=Neela.Kolli@engenio.com \
--cc=Seokmann.Ju@lsil.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sreenib@lsil.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox