From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: John Coffman <johninsd@san.rr.com>
Cc: Alon Bar-Lev <alon.barlev@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Barry K. Nathan" <barryn@pobox.com>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>,
tony.luck@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit
Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 22:11:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <445C301E.6060509@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.0.20060505204729.036dfdf8@pop-server.san.rr.com>
John Coffman wrote:
> At 02:57 PM Friday 5/5/2006, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Okay, let me ask this:
>
>> If the *kernel* limit is modified, but the LILO limit is not, what
>> will happen? This is the real crux of the matter.
>
> The length of the kernel command line will be limited by the size of the
> boot loader buffer. LILO always inserts a NUL terminator.
>
> --John
>
> P.S. The LILO command line buffer has always been 1 sector (512 bytes);
> however, only the first half is actually used for the command line. No
> kernel can do any harm by setting "boot_cmdline[511] = 0;" for any
> version of LILO back to version 20 (and probably before).
>
Okay... **DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY ACTUAL EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY???**, and
if so, **WHAT ARE THE DETAILS**?
All I've heard so far is hearsay. "X said that Y had said..."
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-06 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-05 13:37 [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit Alon Bar-Lev
2006-05-05 14:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-05-05 14:28 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-05-05 14:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-05-05 18:10 ` John Coffman
2006-05-05 18:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-05-05 21:48 ` John Coffman
2006-05-05 21:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-05-06 3:57 ` John Coffman
2006-05-06 5:11 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2006-05-06 10:31 ` Alon Bar-Lev
[not found] ` <44AD583B.5040007@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <44AD5BB4.9090005@zytor.com>
[not found] ` <44AD5D47.8010307@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <44AD5FD8.6010307@zytor.com>
[not found] ` <9e0cf0bf0608031436x19262ab0rb2271b52ce75639d@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <44D278D6.2070106@zytor.com>
[not found] ` <9e0cf0bf0608031542q2da20037h828f4b8f0d01c4d5@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <44D27F22.4080205@zytor.com>
2006-08-25 23:57 ` [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping) Alon Bar-Lev
2006-08-27 18:28 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-27 18:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-27 19:16 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-27 19:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-27 20:54 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-27 21:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-28 3:28 ` John Coffman
2006-08-28 6:02 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-08-28 6:41 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-08-28 7:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-28 12:19 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-08-28 18:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-28 18:46 ` Matt Domsch
2006-08-28 19:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-28 20:12 ` Matt Domsch
2006-08-28 20:29 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-08-28 20:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-28 20:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-30 16:49 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-08-30 16:56 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 17:06 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-08-30 17:31 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 17:51 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-08-30 18:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-30 19:06 ` Andi Kleen
2006-08-30 19:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-30 19:23 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-08-30 19:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-30 18:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-28 19:24 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2006-08-28 20:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-29 0:13 ` [PATCH] Fix the EDD code misparsing the command line H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-29 1:24 ` Petr Vandrovec
2006-08-29 1:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-29 1:51 ` [PATCH] Fix the EDD code misparsing the command line (rev 2) H. Peter Anvin
2006-08-27 19:59 ` [PATCH] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit (ping) Alon Bar-Lev
2006-05-05 22:02 ` [PATCH][TAKE 4] THE LINUX/I386 BOOT PROTOCOL - Breaking the 256 limit Alon Bar-Lev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=445C301E.6060509@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=alon.barlev@gmail.com \
--cc=barryn@pobox.com \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=johninsd@san.rr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox