From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932068AbWEFTfO (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 May 2006 15:35:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932070AbWEFTfO (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 May 2006 15:35:14 -0400 Received: from fw5.argo.co.il ([194.90.79.130]:12560 "EHLO argo2k.argo.co.il") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932068AbWEFTfM (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 May 2006 15:35:12 -0400 Message-ID: <445CFA6B.9030105@argo.co.il> Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 22:35:07 +0300 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Smirl CC: Dave Pitts , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: How can I boost block I/O performance References: <445CE6ED.30703@cozx.com> <9e4733910605061231v7150c69ela2968d3931523bc5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9e4733910605061231v7150c69ela2968d3931523bc5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 May 2006 19:35:10.0672 (UTC) FILETIME=[302EB500:01C67144] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jon Smirl wrote: > Does the adaptive readahead patch help in your case? Other people in > similar situations are saying that it helps a lot. > > Wu Fengguang > Subject [PATCH 00/23] Adaptive read-ahead V11 > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/3/18/235 > Adaptive readahead is not going to help his write performance... -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.