public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Pitts <dpitts@cozx.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@argo.co.il>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How can I boost block I/O performance
Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 09:41:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <445F66B4.6010907@cozx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <445D81FB.5030808@argo.co.il>

Avi Kivity wrote:

> Dave Pitts wrote:
>
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> Dave Pitts wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- 
>>>> ----cpu----
>>>> r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in    cs 
>>>> us sy id wa
>>>> 4  0    720  80252   1820 7077456    0    0     9   852    5    11  
>>>> 1 14 84  0
>>>
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> 5  0    720  90364   1860 7067080    0    0    40 66956 17995 
>>>> 95384  0 17 82  0
>>>>
>>>> This test is running several NFS clients to a RAID disk storage 
>>>> array. I also see the
>>>> same behavior when running SFTP transfers. What I'd like is a more 
>>>> even block
>>>> out behavior (even at the expense of other apps as this is a file 
>>>> server not an app
>>>> server).  The values that I've been hacking are the 
>>>> dirty_writeback_centisecs,
>>>> dirty_background_ratio, etc. Am I barking up the wrong tree?
>>>
>>>
>>> No  iowait time, plenty of idle time: looks like you are network 
>>> bound. What time of network are you running?
>>>
>> Well, it's an 8 cpu system. Does the idle time reflect the idle time 
>> of all cpu's?
>
>
> It's an average across all cpus. But the numbers are low even for a 
> single cpu system.

OK, I ran some tests, bypassing NFS, and got the following vmstat display:

procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- 
----cpu----
 r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in    cs us sy 
id wa
 4  1    696  80692    844 7225424    0    0    92 263924 14380  6176  2 
40 46 12
 6  0    696 108668    784 7200936    0    0   456  6444 30515 20641  3 
57 36  3
 5  1    696 100916    768 7211220    0    0   508 97276 31761 19916  3 
65 27  4
 7  0    700  91188    764 7217340    0    0   428 121576 28704 21957  3 
69 24 3
 3  3    700 103356    780 7204472    0    0   408 121748 29513 22603  3 
66 23 8
 7  0    700  92836    780 7216168    0    0   360 43508 28784 21410  3 
54 33 11
 7  0    700  88364    768 7224272    0    0   296 158236 26530 17570  3 
66 21 10
10  0    700  91068    776 7219096    0    0   444 141456 30306 16053  3 
74 16 7
 5  2    700 102212    752 7206676    0    0   340 170076 29249 14872  2 
69 19 10
11  0    700  87884    768 7222096    0    0   392 143312 29743 19808  1 
65 23 11
 8  0    700 104692    744 7204644    0    0   240 159624 25814 18747  3 
58 20 19
 9  0    700 107196    736 7205196    0    0   344 148500 28191 18113  3 
70 21 6
16  1    700  99300    768 7211364    0   12   464 164348 25671 18326  4 
64 18 15
 5  4    700 107412   1052 7204824    0    0   936 170904 28994 17062  3 
73 11 14
 8  1    700  98892   1284 7217512    0    0   596 182708 31520 18424  1 
76 13 10

This ia with 6 concurrent data streams. In addition to the 
/proc/sys/vm/dirty* values I  also adjusted
values in mm/page-writeback.c  eg. MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES to 8192 . Our 
goal is to blast out
as much as possible per pdflush invocation.

>
>> The network is a Gigabit Ethernet.
>>
>
> I'd make sure the nics know that by running ethtool (on the clients as 
> well as on the server).
>
>
>


-- 
Dave Pitts                   PULLMAN: Travel and sleep in safety and comfort.
dpitts@cozx.com              My other RV IS a Pullman (Colorado Pine).
http://www.cozx.com/~dpitts


  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-08 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-06 18:11 How can I boost block I/O performance Dave Pitts
2006-05-06 19:31 ` Jon Smirl
2006-05-06 19:35   ` Avi Kivity
2006-05-06 19:32 ` Avi Kivity
2006-05-06 21:17   ` Dave Pitts
2006-05-07  5:13     ` Avi Kivity
2006-05-08 15:41       ` Dave Pitts [this message]
2006-05-08 15:50         ` Avi Kivity
2006-05-06 23:55 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-05-08 11:18   ` Erik Mouw

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=445F66B4.6010907@cozx.com \
    --to=dpitts@cozx.com \
    --cc=avi@argo.co.il \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox