From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc4 6/6] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 08:31:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4466DCE9.7010906@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a8748490605131221nbadedf4p8904d9627f61f425@mail.gmail.com>
Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 13/05/06, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MEMLEAK
>> + /* avoid a false alarm. That's not a memory leak */
>> + memleak_free(out);
>> +#endif
>
>
> Hmm, so eventually we are going to end up with a bunch of ussgly #ifdef
> CONFIG_DEBUG_MEMLEAK's all over the place?
>
> Wouldn't it be better to just make memleak_free() an empty stub in the
> !CONFIG_DEBUG_MEMLEAK case?
Yes, I'll make empty stubs (Paul suggested this as well).
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-14 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-13 15:57 [RFC PATCH 2.6.17-rc4 0/6] Kernel memory leak detector Catalin Marinas
2006-05-13 16:05 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc4 1/6] Base support for kmemleak Catalin Marinas
2006-05-13 17:42 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-05-13 17:47 ` Roland Dreier
2006-05-14 7:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-05-14 17:32 ` Ingo Oeser
2006-05-15 10:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-05-13 18:11 ` Paul Jackson
2006-05-13 23:20 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-14 8:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-05-15 9:15 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-15 10:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-05-26 8:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-26 9:39 ` Andi Kleen
2006-05-26 11:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-26 16:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-05-26 17:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-05-26 21:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-05-26 22:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-05-14 14:53 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-05-14 15:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-05-14 15:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-05-13 16:05 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc4 2/6] Some documentation " Catalin Marinas
2006-05-13 16:06 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc4 3/6] Add the memory allocation/freeing hooks " Catalin Marinas
2006-05-14 14:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-05-13 16:06 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc4 4/6] Add kmemleak support for i386 Catalin Marinas
2006-05-13 18:24 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-05-13 21:20 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-05-14 7:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-05-13 16:06 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc4 5/6] Add kmemleak support for ARM Catalin Marinas
2006-05-13 18:25 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-05-13 16:06 ` [PATCH 2.6.17-rc4 6/6] Remove some of the kmemleak false positives Catalin Marinas
2006-05-13 19:21 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-05-14 7:31 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2006-05-14 14:55 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-05-14 15:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-05-14 17:39 ` Ingo Oeser
2006-05-15 10:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-05-15 18:32 ` Ingo Oeser
2006-05-15 11:52 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4466DCE9.7010906@gmail.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@gmail.com \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox