public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Ayres <matta@tektonic.net>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Netfilter Development Mailinglist 
	<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:01:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44691669.4080903@tektonic.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4468D613.20309@trash.net>

Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Matt Ayres wrote:
>> I have been noticing this same problem dozens of times and have finally
>> caught a full trace.  I have run it through ksymoops, but there is no
>> /proc/ksyms.  Is there a better method for getting information out of
>> the Code line than using ksymoops in 2.6 kernels?
> 
> 
> CONFIG_KALLSYMS will make the kernel decode the oops itself.
> 

That's odd, I had thought that too.  This is what "zcat /proc/config.gz 
| grep KALL" shows:

CONFIG_KALLSYMS=y
# CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL is not set
# CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS is not set

I take it my run through ksymoops was of no help in diagnosing the 
problem?  The panic is _always_ in ipt_do_table.

>> The kernel is for Xen, but it does not appear to be related to Xen.
> 
> 
> We haven't had problems in that code for ages, so my initial feeling
> is that it probably is related to Xen. Do you have any other patches
> applied besides Xen? Please also post the full ruleset you're using
> and anything else that might appear special about your setup.
> 

I had initially sent my traces to the Xen guys.  They have not stated it 
is NOT specific to Xen, just that's it's unlikely.  I did not experience 
the problem with kernel 2.6.12, just with 2.6.16 (up to .13 bugfix 
release).  I have completely disabled all support for SCTP 
(protocol/netfilter/conntrack) as I know it is still quite buggy.  I 
know Xen touches the network code a lot, but nothing specific to 
iptables.  I had contacted them twice before LKML as I didn't want to 
post patch specific problems here.  I have no other patches applied 
besides the Xen patch.

My ruleset is pretty bland.  2 rules in the raw table to tell the system 
to only track my forwarded ports, 2 rules in the nat table for 
forwarding (intercepting) 2 ports, and then in the FORWARD tables 2 
rules per VM to just account traffic.

I've CC'ed xen-devel on this in case they can provide some insight.  I 
am not subscribed to LKML so please make sure to reply to me also in 
responses.

Thank you,
Matt Ayres

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-16  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-15 17:46 Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen Matt Ayres
2006-05-15 19:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-16  0:01   ` Matt Ayres [this message]
2006-05-16  3:31     ` James Morris
2006-05-16 13:49       ` [Xen-devel] " Matt Ayres
2006-05-16 15:28         ` James Morris
2006-05-18 23:58           ` Matt Ayres
2006-05-19  0:05             ` James Morris
2006-05-19  0:16               ` Matt Ayres
2006-05-19  0:45                 ` Matt Ayres
2006-05-21 17:43                   ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-22 14:31                     ` Matt Ayres
2006-05-22 14:42                       ` Keir Fraser
2006-05-22 14:43                       ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-23  9:54                         ` Keir Fraser
2006-05-23 12:03                           ` Matt Ayres
2006-05-23 21:15                         ` Keir Fraser
2006-05-23 21:23                           ` Matt Ayres
2006-05-23 21:27                             ` Keir Fraser
2006-05-24  7:16                               ` Gerd Hoffmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44691669.4080903@tektonic.net \
    --to=matta@tektonic.net \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox