From: Matt Ayres <matta@tektonic.net>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:01:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44691669.4080903@tektonic.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4468D613.20309@trash.net>
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Matt Ayres wrote:
>> I have been noticing this same problem dozens of times and have finally
>> caught a full trace. I have run it through ksymoops, but there is no
>> /proc/ksyms. Is there a better method for getting information out of
>> the Code line than using ksymoops in 2.6 kernels?
>
>
> CONFIG_KALLSYMS will make the kernel decode the oops itself.
>
That's odd, I had thought that too. This is what "zcat /proc/config.gz
| grep KALL" shows:
CONFIG_KALLSYMS=y
# CONFIG_KALLSYMS_ALL is not set
# CONFIG_KALLSYMS_EXTRA_PASS is not set
I take it my run through ksymoops was of no help in diagnosing the
problem? The panic is _always_ in ipt_do_table.
>> The kernel is for Xen, but it does not appear to be related to Xen.
>
>
> We haven't had problems in that code for ages, so my initial feeling
> is that it probably is related to Xen. Do you have any other patches
> applied besides Xen? Please also post the full ruleset you're using
> and anything else that might appear special about your setup.
>
I had initially sent my traces to the Xen guys. They have not stated it
is NOT specific to Xen, just that's it's unlikely. I did not experience
the problem with kernel 2.6.12, just with 2.6.16 (up to .13 bugfix
release). I have completely disabled all support for SCTP
(protocol/netfilter/conntrack) as I know it is still quite buggy. I
know Xen touches the network code a lot, but nothing specific to
iptables. I had contacted them twice before LKML as I didn't want to
post patch specific problems here. I have no other patches applied
besides the Xen patch.
My ruleset is pretty bland. 2 rules in the raw table to tell the system
to only track my forwarded ports, 2 rules in the nat table for
forwarding (intercepting) 2 ports, and then in the FORWARD tables 2
rules per VM to just account traffic.
I've CC'ed xen-devel on this in case they can provide some insight. I
am not subscribed to LKML so please make sure to reply to me also in
responses.
Thank you,
Matt Ayres
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-16 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-15 17:46 Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen Matt Ayres
2006-05-15 19:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-16 0:01 ` Matt Ayres [this message]
2006-05-16 3:31 ` James Morris
2006-05-16 13:49 ` [Xen-devel] " Matt Ayres
2006-05-16 15:28 ` James Morris
2006-05-18 23:58 ` Matt Ayres
2006-05-19 0:05 ` James Morris
2006-05-19 0:16 ` Matt Ayres
2006-05-19 0:45 ` Matt Ayres
2006-05-21 17:43 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-22 14:31 ` Matt Ayres
2006-05-22 14:42 ` Keir Fraser
2006-05-22 14:43 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-23 9:54 ` Keir Fraser
2006-05-23 12:03 ` Matt Ayres
2006-05-23 21:15 ` Keir Fraser
2006-05-23 21:23 ` Matt Ayres
2006-05-23 21:27 ` Keir Fraser
2006-05-24 7:16 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44691669.4080903@tektonic.net \
--to=matta@tektonic.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox